Reinforcement effect of middle partition wall in ultra-small spacing section of subway shield tunnel
-
摘要: 为了探明地铁盾构隧道超小净距地段中隔墙加固效果,依托广州地铁12号线大学城南停车场出入场线工程,利用FLAC 3D软件建立盾构隧道施工仿真模型,分析未加固与中隔墙加固情况下超小净距盾构隧道施工对周边岩土体及先修隧道的影响规律。结果表明:随着盾构开挖深度的增加,地表沉降、土体水平位移、先修隧道管片变形均有明显增大,中岩柱稳定性降低;采用中隔墙加固措施效果显著,与未加固时相比,工程开挖至19环时,地表沉降与土体水平位移最大值分别降低31.1%,70%,先行隧道管片横向扩张与竖向变形最大值分别降低56.8%,73.5%,中岩柱稳定性明显提高,故在超小净距地段采用中隔墙可以起到良好的加固作用。Abstract: To explore the reinforcement effect of the middle partition wall in the ultra-small spacing section of the subway shield tunnel, based on the entrance and exit line project of the south parking lot of Guangzhou Metro Line 12, the FLAC 3D software was used to establish the simulation model of the shield tunnel construction, and to analyze the influence law of the ultra-small spacing shield tunnel construction on the surrounding rock and soil mass and the pre-built tunnel under the condition of unreinforced and middle partition wall reinforcement. The results show that with the increase of shield excavation depth, the surface settlement, the horizontal displacement of soil and the deformation of the tunnel segment were obviously increased, and the stability of the middle rock column was reduced. The reinforcement effect of the middle partition wall was remarkable. Compared with the unreinforced condition, when the project was excavated to the 19th ring, the maximum surface settlement and horizontal displacement of the soil were reduced by 31.1% and 70%, respectively. The maximum lateral expansion and vertical deformation of the first tunnel segment were reduced by 56.8% and 73.5%, respectively. The stability of the middle rock column was obviously improved. Therefore, the middle partition wall can play a good reinforcement effect in the ultra-small clear distance section.
-
表 1 岩土物理力学参数
土层名称 密度/(kg·m−3) 黏聚力/kPa 内摩擦角/($^\circ $) 弹性模量/MPa 泊松比 素填土 1900 21.0 13.5 8 0.34 粉质黏土 1910 26.9 15.8 18 0.32 混合花岗岩残积土(可塑) 1840 23.7 16.6 25.3 0.30 混合花岗岩残积土(硬塑) 1860 25.5 18.8 41.4 0.29 全风化混合花岗岩 1840 28.3 22.2 80.0 0.28 强风化碎块状混合花岗岩 2150 60.0 30.0 360 0.28 中等风化混合花岗岩 2330 200.0 42.0 1200 0.29 微风化混合花岗岩 2600 500.0 48.0 5000 0.29 表 2 材料物理力学参数
材料 密度/(kg·m−3) 弹性模量/MPa 泊松比 中隔墙 2400 $2.55 \times {10^4}$ 0.2 管片 2500 $3.45 \times {10^4}$ 0.3 注浆材料 硬化前 2000 1.20 0.3 硬化后 2000 6.00 04 盾壳 7850 $2 \times {10^5}$ 0.3 表 3 N1—N5测点水平位移
mm 监测断面 加固情况 N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 第4环 未加固 0.52 −0.73 0.58 1.28 0.64 加固 0.58 −0.29 0.01 0.39 0.17 第7环 未加固 0.53 −0.89 5.55 3.55 1.02 加固 1.54 −0.48 1.86 1.6 1.15 第10环 未加固 1.77 −0.92 13.29 7.88 2.18 加固 2.89 −0.58 3.8 3.79 2.48 第13环 未加固 2.37 −0.64 15.05 8.51 2.44 加固 3.64 −0.46 4.74 4.62 2.92 第16环 未加固 2.95 0 21.03 9.82 2.91 加固 4.44 0 6.24 5.8 3.57 第19环 未加固 3.24 0 24.76 10.19 2.98 加固 4.91 0 7.32 6.53 3.85 表 4 N1—N5测点竖向位移
mm 监测断面 加固情况 N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 第4环 未加固 −6.85 −8.93 −13.26 −9.31 −4.32 加固 −4.48 −5.98 −5.62 −5.58 −5.56 第7环 未加固 −6.91 −8.03 −33.51 −2.28 1.67 加固 −4.46 −5.60 −5.82 −5.51 −5.25 第10环 未加固 −6.78 −7.63 −54.74 1.13 6.93 加固 −4.44 −5.33 −5.92 −5.37 −4.94 第13环 未加固 −6.58 −5.10 −58.72 1.74 7.69 加固 −4.39 −3.59 −5.95 −5.31 −4.84 第16环 未加固 −6.13 −0.15 −68.99 4.72 9.29 加固 −4.29 −0.12 −5.92 −5.20 −4.69 第19环 未加固 −5.81 −0.13 −82.35 4.20 9.53 加固 −4.22 −0.08 −5.88 −5.12 −4.61 -
[1] 崔光耀, 田宇航, 肖 毅, 等. 高风险城市环境地铁小净距隧道近接隧道群施工方案优选[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(3):156-161. (CUI G Y, TIAN Y H, XIAO Y, et al. Optimization of construction scheme for metro small clear distance tunnel close to tunnel group in high-risk urban environment[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2022,18(3):156-161. (in Chinese)CUI G Y, TIAN Y H, XIAO Y, et al. Optimization of construction scheme for metro small clear distance tunnel close to tunnel group in high-risk urban environment[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2022, 18(3): 156-161. (in Chinese) [2] 宋高锐, 王渭明, 王国富, 等. 盾构与浅埋暗挖隧道小净距并行施工工法优选[J]. 科学技术与工程,2021,21(15):6472-6478. (SONG G R, WANG W M, WANG G F, et al. Optimization of shield tunneling and shallow buried tunnel with small clear distance in parallel construction[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(15):6472-6478. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2021.15.051SONG G R, WANG W M, WANG G F, et al. Optimization of shield tunneling and shallow buried tunnel with small clear distance in parallel construction[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(15): 6472-6478. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2021.15.051 [3] 李 宗. 软土条件下地铁小净距盾构隧道变形控制技术[J]. 铁道标准设计,2012(6):112-116. (LI Z. Technology on deformation control of close-spaced shield tunnel of metro in soft soil conditions[J]. Railway Standard Design,2012(6):112-116. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2954.2012.06.029LI Z. Technology on deformation control of close-spaced shield tunnel of metro in soft soil conditions[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2012(6): 112-116. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2954.2012.06.029 [4] ZHENG H B, LI P F, MA G W. Stability analysis of the middle soil pillar for asymmetric parallel tunnels by using model testing and numerical simulations[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2021,108:103686. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103686 [5] 刘庆丰, 吴 剑, 刘 凯. 盾构并行穿越施工对既有隧道影响分析与关键技术[J]. 科学技术与工程,2020,20(12):4939-4947. (LIU Q F, WU J, LIU K. Influence analysis and key technology of shield tunnel parallel crossing construction under existing tunnels[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2020,20(12):4939-4947. (in Chinese)LIU Q F, WU J, LIU K. Influence analysis and key technology of shield tunnel parallel crossing construction under existing tunnels[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(12): 4939-4947. (in Chinese) [6] 何 川, 苏宗贤, 曾东洋. 盾构隧道施工对已建平行隧道变形和附加内力的影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(10):2063-2069. (HE C, SU Z X, ZENG D Y. Research on influence of shield tunnel construction on deformation and secondary inner force of constructed parallel tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(10):2063-2069. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.10.015HE C, SU Z X, ZENG D Y. Research on influence of shield tunnel construction on deformation and secondary inner force of constructed parallel tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(10): 2063-2069. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.10.015 [7] 戴 俊, 田国宾, 熊咸玉. 基于围岩受力影响的小净距隧道开挖方法优化[J]. 科学技术与工程,2019,19(29):307-311. (DAI J, TIAN G B, XIONG X Y. Optimization of excavation method of small spacing tunnel based on the influence of surrounding rock stress[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2019,19(29):307-311. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.29.050DAI J, TIAN G B, XIONG X Y. Optimization of excavation method of small spacing tunnel based on the influence of surrounding rock stress[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(29): 307-311. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.29.050 [8] 姚 勇, 何 川, 谢卓雄. 双线小净距隧道中岩墙力学特征及加固措施研究[J]. 岩土力学,2007,28(9):1883-1888. (YAO Y, HE C, XIE Z X. Study of mechanical behavior and reinforcing measures of middle rock wall of parallel tunnel with small interval[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2007,28(9):1883-1888. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2007.09.021YAO Y, HE C, XIE Z X. Study of mechanical behavior and reinforcing measures of middle rock wall of parallel tunnel with small interval[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(9): 1883-1888. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2007.09.021 [9] 扈 萍, 马 梁, 李 萌, 等. 小净距隧道后行洞开挖对先行洞的变形影响[J]. 济南大学学报(自然科学版),2022,36(3):246-251,272. (HU P, MA L, LI M, et al. Deformation effect of subsequent holes excavation on advanced holes in small clear distance tunnels[J]. Journal of University of Jinan (Science and Technology),2022,36(3):246-251,272. (in Chinese)HU P, MA L, LI M, et al. Deformation effect of subsequent holes excavation on advanced holes in small clear distance tunnels[J]. Journal of University of Jinan (Science and Technology), 2022, 36(3): 246-251,272. (in Chinese) [10] 李雨哲, 柏 署, 杨 雄, 等. 不等跨四连拱隧道中隔墙结构受力现场测试与分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2023,45(10):2201-2208. (LI Y Z, BAI S, YANG X, et al. Field mechanical tests and analyses of partition walls in unequal-span four-arch tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2023,45(10):2201-2208. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE20220809LI Y Z, BAI S, YANG X, et al. Field mechanical tests and analyses of partition walls in unequal-span four-arch tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(10): 2201-2208. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE20220809 [11] 田鲁鲁, 张 智, 郭永发. 浅埋连拱隧道中隔墙地基受力变形及注浆加固研究[J]. 岩土工程技术,2023,37(3):284-290. (TIAN L L, ZHANG Z, GUO Y F. Foundation force and grouting reinforcement of central separate wall in shallow buried multi-arch tunnel[J]. Geotechnical Engineering Technique,2023,37(3):284-290. (in Chinese)TIAN L L, ZHANG Z, GUO Y F. Foundation force and grouting reinforcement of central separate wall in shallow buried multi-arch tunnel[J]. Geotechnical Engineering Technique, 2023, 37(3): 284-290. (in Chinese) [12] 董 飞, 黄 俊, 李 奥, 等. 大直径盾构隧道中隔墙顶裂缝模式及扩展机制研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2023,43(1):82-91. (DONG F, HUANG J, LI A, et al. Crack mode and propagation mechanism of diaphragm wall top in large-diameter shield tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction,2023,43(1):82-91. (in Chinese)DONG F, HUANG J, LI A, et al. Crack mode and propagation mechanism of diaphragm wall top in large-diameter shield tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2023, 43(1): 82-91. (in Chinese) [13] 杜阳平. 土压盾构隧道小净距施工处理措施[J]. 居舍, 2021(22): 41-42. (DU Y P. Measures to deal with small clearances in earth pressure shield tunnel construction[J]. Ju She, 2021(22): 41-42. (in Chinese)DU Y P. Measures to deal with small clearances in earth pressure shield tunnel construction[J]. Ju She, 2021(22): 41-42. (in Chinese) [14] 赵乙丁, 刘守花, 阳军生, 等. 小净距浅埋盾构隧道相互影响机制与控制措施研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报,2020,44(1):120-128. (ZHAO Y D, LIU S H, YANG J S, et al. Interaction mechanisms and control measures of shallow-buried shield tunnels with small clear distance[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University,2020,44(1):120-128. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11860/j.issn.1673-0291.20190075ZHAO Y D, LIU S H, YANG J S, et al. Interaction mechanisms and control measures of shallow-buried shield tunnels with small clear distance[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2020, 44(1): 120-128. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11860/j.issn.1673-0291.20190075 -