留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

地下工程细水泥与普通水泥灌浆对比试验研究

荆少东 丁长栋 贾春磊 张宜虎 朱瑜劼

荆少东, 丁长栋, 贾春磊, 张宜虎, 朱瑜劼. 地下工程细水泥与普通水泥灌浆对比试验研究[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2025, 39(2): 305-310. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2024-0174
引用本文: 荆少东, 丁长栋, 贾春磊, 张宜虎, 朱瑜劼. 地下工程细水泥与普通水泥灌浆对比试验研究[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2025, 39(2): 305-310. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2024-0174
Jing Shaodong, Ding Changdong, Jia Chunlei, Zhang Yihu, Zhu Yujie. Comparative experimental study on grouting of fine cement and ordinary cement in underground engineering[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2025, 39(2): 305-310. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2024-0174
Citation: Jing Shaodong, Ding Changdong, Jia Chunlei, Zhang Yihu, Zhu Yujie. Comparative experimental study on grouting of fine cement and ordinary cement in underground engineering[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2025, 39(2): 305-310. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2024-0174

地下工程细水泥与普通水泥灌浆对比试验研究

doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2024-0174
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(52309123;U2340226);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费资助项目(CKSF2023310/YT;CKSF2023319/YT);岩土力学与工程安全重点实验室开放基金课题(No. SKLGME023013)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    荆少东,男,1972年生,博士,正高级工程师。研究方向:工程地质勘察与岩土工程。E-mail:sjyjsd@126.com

    通讯作者:

    丁长栋,男,1994年生,博士,工程师。研究方向:岩石力学与地下工程。E-mail:dingcd@mail.crsri.cn

  • 中图分类号: TV41

Comparative experimental study on grouting of fine cement and ordinary cement in underground engineering

  • 摘要: 水封洞库、储气库、引水隧洞等地下工程对区域渗流场控制均有严格要求,灌浆是控制工程区域渗流场的重要方式。不同地质条件下的岩体可灌性不同,对灌浆材料的粒径敏感性也不同,需要开展相关试验论证,为工程施工提供科学依据。依托某水封洞库灌浆施工,通过开展超细水泥、湿磨细水泥与普通水泥灌浆对比试验,研究不同类型灌浆材料在该工程中的适用性。试验结果表明:当岩体透水率较大时,超细水泥、湿磨细水泥与普通水泥三种灌浆材料渗控效果差异不明显,相同岩体透水率条件下,采用不同材料灌浆,单位耗灰量总体一致;灌浆压力增大,灌浆孔的单位耗灰量显著增加,灌浆实施效果显著提升;当岩体透水率很小,采用超细水泥或湿磨细水泥能够进一步降低围岩渗水量。因此,在依托工程中无需大范围采用超细水泥和湿磨细水泥进行灌浆,在普通水泥可灌性不强的特殊情况下,建议采用超细水泥和湿磨细水泥灌浆,同时合理调节灌浆压力,以显著改善灌浆效果。

     

  • 图  1  超细及普通水泥灌浆试验灌前透水率–(单压)单耗散点图

    图  2  湿磨细水泥后灌浆试验孔灌前透水率–单压单耗散点图

    图  3  湿磨细水泥和普通水泥后灌浆Ⅰ序孔灌前透水率–单压单耗散点图对比

    图  4  湿磨细水泥和普通水泥后灌浆Ⅱ序孔灌前透水率–单压单耗散点图对比

    表  1  超细水泥灌浆试验灌浆孔信息表

    序号 部位 孔序 围岩类型 孔数/个 孔深/m 灌浆压力/MPa 灌浆材料
    1 施工巷道①K0+620.5—K0+630.5 Ⅲ2 18 4.5 1.5 普通水泥
    Ⅲ2 22 4.5 1.5 超细水泥
    2 施工巷道①K0+807.8 Ⅲ2 7 15 2.2 普通水泥
    Ⅲ2 7 15 2.2 超细水泥
    3 施工巷道④K0+175—K0+185 Ⅲ2 31 6 1.05 普通水泥
    Ⅲ2 15 6 1.05 超细水泥
    4 施工巷道③K0+821.5—K0+831.5 Ⅲ2 55 6 1.0 普通水泥
    Ⅲ2 44 6 1.5 超细水泥
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  湿磨细水泥灌浆试验灌浆孔信息表

    序号部位孔序孔数
    /个
    孔深
    /m
    耗灰量
    /kg
    灌浆类型及材料
    1施工巷道④
    K0+226—K0+231
    1864704后灌浆、湿磨细水泥
    1861928
    2施工巷道③
    K1+327—K1+337
    60611239
    5063667
    3施工巷道④
    K0+105—K0+126
    37616862
    3063850
    4施工巷道④
    K0+140—K0+158
    68620298
    5569921
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 左 崇, 张继勋, 任旭华, 等. 围岩灌浆深度对水封石油洞库水封效果的影响[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2020,42(1):30-35. (ZUO C, ZHANG J X, REN X H, et al. Effect of rock grouting depth on containment property of containment oil storage cavern[J]. Journal of China Three Gorges University (Natural Sciences),2020,42(1):30-35. (in Chinese)

    ZUO C, ZHANG J X, REN X H, et al. Effect of rock grouting depth on containment property of containment oil storage cavern[J]. Journal of China Three Gorges University (Natural Sciences), 2020, 42(1): 30-35. (in Chinese)
    [2] 秦之勇, 高锡敏. 我国水封石洞油库研究现状及思考[J]. 长江科学院院报,2019,36(5):141-148. (QIN Z Y, GAO X M. Research status and thinking about underground oil storage in rock caverns in China[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2019,36(5):141-148. (in Chinese)

    QIN Z Y, GAO X M. Research status and thinking about underground oil storage in rock caverns in China[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2019, 36(5): 141-148. (in Chinese)
    [3] 彭振华, 李俊彦, 孙承志, 等. 地下水封洞库的库址选择研究[J]. 油气储运,2008,27(1):60-62. (PENG Z H, LI J Y, SUN C Z, et al. Site determination on underground water-sealing oil storage in Rock Caverns[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2008,27(1):60-62. (in Chinese)

    PENG Z H, LI J Y, SUN C Z, et al. Site determination on underground water-sealing oil storage in Rock Caverns[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2008, 27(1): 60-62. (in Chinese)
    [4] 蒋中明, 钟 兵, 万 发. 水封石油洞库污染物运移规律研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2023,45(12):2529-2536. (JIANG Z M, ZHONG B, WAN F. Migration laws of pollutants in surrounding rock of underground oil storage caverns[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2023,45(12):2529-2536. (in Chinese)

    JIANG Z M, ZHONG B, WAN F. Migration laws of pollutants in surrounding rock of underground oil storage caverns[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(12): 2529-2536. (in Chinese)
    [5] 邵晓妹, 卢其波, 李发权. 地下水封洞库水泥–水玻璃防渗灌浆材料耐久性试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报,2018,35(8):154-158. (SHAO X M, LU Q B, LI F Q. Experimental study on durability of grouting material composed of cement and water glass for underground water-sealed cavern[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2018,35(8):154-158. (in Chinese)

    SHAO X M, LU Q B, LI F Q. Experimental study on durability of grouting material composed of cement and water glass for underground water-sealed cavern[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2018, 35(8): 154-158. (in Chinese)
    [6] 王者超, 张振杰, 李术才, 等. 基于离散裂隙网络法的地下石油洞库洞室间水封性评价[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版),2016,46(2):94-100,115. (WANG Z C, ZHANG Z J, LI S C, et al. Assessment of inter-cavern containment property for underground oil storage caverns using discrete fracture networks[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science),2016,46(2):94-100,115. (in Chinese)

    WANG Z C, ZHANG Z J, LI S C, et al. Assessment of inter-cavern containment property for underground oil storage caverns using discrete fracture networks[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science), 2016, 46(2): 94-100,115. (in Chinese)
    [7] 温毓繁, 余 雷, 孔琼菊. 地下水封石油洞库工程的灌浆参数模拟分析[J]. 水资源与水工程学报,2017,28(2):168-172. (WEN Y F, YU L, KONG Q J. The simulation of grouting parameters of underground petroleum storage caverns project[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering,2017,28(2):168-172. (in Chinese)

    WEN Y F, YU L, KONG Q J. The simulation of grouting parameters of underground petroleum storage caverns project[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2017, 28(2): 168-172. (in Chinese)
    [8] 李术才, 张 立, 马秀媛, 等. 大型地下水封石油洞库渗流场时空演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学,2013,34(7):1979-1986. (LI S C, ZHANG L, MA X Y, et al. Space-time evolution behaviour of seepage field around a large underground petroleum storage caverns with groundwater curtaining[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2013,34(7):1979-1986. (in Chinese)

    LI S C, ZHANG L, MA X Y, et al. Space-time evolution behaviour of seepage field around a large underground petroleum storage caverns with groundwater curtaining[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(7): 1979-1986. (in Chinese)
    [9] 黄志驹, 王 志, 李 领. 地下水封石油洞库竖井地面预注浆技术应用[J]. 红水河,2022,41(5):121-124. (HUANG Z J, WANG Z, LI L. Technology application on Pre-Grouting from the surface of shaft in underground water-sealed oil storage cavern[J]. Hongshui River,2022,41(5):121-124. (in Chinese)

    HUANG Z J, WANG Z, LI L. Technology application on Pre-Grouting from the surface of shaft in underground water-sealed oil storage cavern[J]. Hongshui River, 2022, 41(5): 121-124. (in Chinese)
    [10] 吴 波, 王 凯, 郭 钊. 地下水封洞库灌浆止水施工技术及应用[J]. 水利建设与管理,2022,42(10):48-51,65. (WU B, WANG K, GUO Z. Construction technology and application of grouting and water stop for underground water-sealed cave depot[J]. Water Conservancy Construction and Management,2022,42(10):48-51,65. (in Chinese)

    WU B, WANG K, GUO Z. Construction technology and application of grouting and water stop for underground water-sealed cave depot[J]. Water Conservancy Construction and Management, 2022, 42(10): 48-51,65. (in Chinese)
    [11] 白文军. 水封洞库工程预灌浆策略及实施要点[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文),2022,53(S2):200-204. (BAI W J. Pre-excavation grouting strategy and implementation points of water sealed cavern project[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,2022,53(S2):200-204. (in Chinese)

    BAI W J. Pre-excavation grouting strategy and implementation points of water sealed cavern project[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2022, 53(S2): 200-204. (in Chinese)
    [12] 杨培洲, 孙起军, 李丰年, 等. 雅砻江两河口水电站大坝灌浆技术[J]. 水利水电快报,2023,44(1):54-58. (YANG P Z, SUN Q J, LI F N, et al. Grouting technology for dam of Lianghekou Hydropower Station on Yalong River[J]. Express Water Resources & Hydropower Information,2023,44(1):54-58. (in Chinese)

    YANG P Z, SUN Q J, LI F N, et al. Grouting technology for dam of Lianghekou Hydropower Station on Yalong River[J]. Express Water Resources & Hydropower Information, 2023, 44(1): 54-58. (in Chinese)
    [13] 卢晓鹏. 水库试蓄水过程中坝基局部渗漏分析及处理[J]. 人民长江,2021,52(S2):91-94. (LU X P. Analysis and treatment of dam foundation local leakage in reservoir trial storage process[J]. Yangtze River,2021,52(S2):91-94. (in Chinese)

    LU X P. Analysis and treatment of dam foundation local leakage in reservoir trial storage process[J]. Yangtze River, 2021, 52(S2): 91-94. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(4) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  24
  • HTML全文浏览量:  6
  • PDF下载量:  6
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-04-19
  • 修回日期:  2024-06-26
  • 录用日期:  2024-08-29
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-04-07
  • 刊出日期:  2025-04-08

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回