Application of Survey Technology in Pile Foundation Construction of Special Structural Confined Water Field
-
摘要: 针对某工程旋挖钻孔灌注桩实施过程中出现的严重冒水涌砂现象,利用勘察技术对该问题进行分析研究,认为冒水涌砂问题来自于特殊构造性承压水的作用。对此,提出了改用正循环成孔工艺,通过增加泥浆比重及黏度来减小地下承压水水头压力,减轻或消除孔底涌砂现象。再采用加大桩径、增加桩长、对桩侧泥皮及桩端沉渣用后压浆进行处理,有效解决了该工程桩基施工中不同工艺可能造成的承载力及变形有较大差异的技术难题,保证了桩基承载力及变形均满足设计及规范要求。Abstract: In view of the serious phenomenon of water and sand gushing during the implementation of the rotary drilling cast-in-place pile, the problem was discussed according to survey technology. The problem of water and sand gushing comes from the effect of the special structural confined water. In order to solve this problem, reverse circulation drilling technology was proposed to reduce the head pressure of underground confined water and reduce or eliminate the sand gushing at the bottom of the hole by increasing the mud specific gravity and viscosity. Then, the post-grouting process was used to deal with the mud skin effect on the side of the pile and the sediment at the end of the pile, and the measures such as increasing the diameter and length of the pile were adopted to effectively solve the technical problems. It effectively solves the technical problem that the bearing capacity and deformation may be greatly different caused by different processes in the pile foundation construction of the project, and ensures that the bearing capacity and deformation of the pile foundation meet the requirements of the design and specifications.
-
表 1 桩基有效长度范围内场地地层结构一览表
层名及层号 土性描述 层厚/m 自地面起算层底埋深/m 黄土③ 褐黄色,软塑,湿,中压缩性。 6.00~11.5 12.30~16.80 古土壤④ 棕红—棕黄色,可塑,饱和,中压缩性,该层在场地东部3#、8#孔受剥蚀而缺失 0.70~4.30 16.30~16.90 黄土⑤ 褐黄色,可塑,中压缩性 9.90~11.2 26.50~27.50 粉质黏土⑥ 黄灰—褐色,可塑,中压缩性 12.4~15.4 38.30~40.00 粉质黏土⑦ 黄褐—灰黄色,可塑,中压缩性。夹有粉土⑦-1及中粗砂夹层⑦-2 3.20~6.00 44.00~46.30 -
[1] 黄丹青,毛南赵. 关中盆地地貌类型及新构造运动分析[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版),2018,20(1):1-5. [2] 谢 青,曾忠诚,张若愚,等. 关中盆地上新世地层形成时代、层序划分及沉积相特征研究[J]. 地质找矿论丛,2018,33(3):434-440. doi: 10.6053/j.issn.1001-1412.2018.03.014 [3] 王 克,周 阳,穆根胥,等. 关中盆地主要城市浅层地下水特征分析研究[J]. 地下水,2017,39(2):14-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2017.02.005 [4] 白琴琴. 西安地区“采水型”地裂缝超常活动分析研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2019. [5] 曹伟忠. 西安地裂缝两盘地下水位差异成因分析[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2012. [6] 宋 扬,周维博,马 聪,等. 西安主城区地下水埋深空间变异性分析[J]. 人民黄河,2015,37(8):56-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2015.08.015 [7] 李海彬,宋东伟,刘冬梅. 锅锥钻孔成桩法在湿陷性黄土地区水下小直径桩中的应用实例[J]. 岩土工程界,2001,4(11):37-38. [8] 张建英,邢心魁,姚克俭. 大直径旋挖钻孔灌注桩应用实例[J]. 岩土工程技术,2003,(3):175-179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2003.03.013 [9] 王俊超. 旋挖钻孔灌注桩施工中常见质量问题分析[J]. 施工技术,2012,41(S1):18-20. [10] 赵立波. 高水位涌砂夹层地质钻孔桩施工技术[J]. 四川建筑,2011,31(2):216-217. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8983.2011.02.089 [11] 王飞永,彭建兵,卢全中,等. 渭河盆地地裂缝同生机制研究[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版),2019,55(3):339-348. [12] 赵俊彦. 渭河盆地地震地裂缝成因机制探讨[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2019. [13] 易学发,苏 刚,王卫东,等. 西安地裂缝带的基本特征与形成机制[J]. 地震地质,1997,19(4):289-295. [14] 孟庆生. 西安地裂缝发育特征及灾害防治措施[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2010. [15] 万佳威,李 滨,谭成轩,等. 中国地裂缝的发育特征及成因机制研究—以汾渭盆地、河北平原、苏锡常平原为例[J]. 地质评论,2019,65(6):1383-1396. [16] 西安市城市规划管理局西安市勘察测绘院. 西安城市工程地质图集[M]. 西安: 西安地图出版社, 1998. [17] DBJ 61—6—2006/J 10821—2006 西安地裂缝场地勘察与工程设计规程[S].