Temperature Stress of Superlong Reinforced Concrete Slab Bracing in Foundation Pit Retaining Structure
-
摘要: 介绍了混凝土支撑轴力计算理论,并将其应用于某大型基坑板支撑轴力监测布置和轴力换算,根据该基坑板支撑轴力、地连墙水平位移和温度监测数据,研究温度变化对超长钢筋混凝土板支撑轴力和围护结构变形的影响,通过两个工况模拟,验证、预测了板支撑轴力和地连墙水平位移随温度的变化规律,并得出如下结论:(1)板支撑轴力与温度的变化趋势相吻合,温度越高时,温度变化对板支撑轴力的影响越显著,日温差对支撑梁轴力的增幅最大可达30%,表明在支护与开挖工况稳定的情况下,温度作用是长板撑支撑梁轴力变化的主要原因;(2)板支撑处地连墙水平位移变化与温度变化具有较好的相关性,但随着深度的增加,温度变化对地连墙水平位移的影响减弱。Abstract: The calculation theory of axial force of concrete support is introduced, and applied to the axial force monitoring arrangement and axial force conversion of a large foundation pit slab support. According to the monitoring data of axial force of foundation pit slab support, horizontal displacement of ground diaphragm wall and temperature, the influence of temperature change on axial force of ultra-long reinforced concrete slab support and deformation of envelope structure was studied. The variation law of plate support axial force and horizontal displacement of ground connecting wall with temperature was verified and predicted, and the following conclusions are drawn: (1) The axial force of slab support is consistent with the trend of temperature change. The higher the temperature is, the more significant the influence of temperature change on the axial force of slab support is. The increase of daily temperature difference on the axial force of beam support is up to 30%, indicating that temperature is the main reason for the axial force change of long slab support beam under stable supporting and excavation conditions. (2) The horizontal displacement of the diaphragm wall at the plate support has a good correlation with the temperature change, but with the increase of depth, the influence of temperature change on the horizontal displacement of the diaphragm wall is weakened.
-
表 1 基坑设计概况
项目 基坑尺寸 坑底标高
/m开挖深度
/m砼支撑
道数地连墙
宽度/mm1区 312 m×105.6 m −8.90 15.90 2 1200/1000 4区 272 m×50 m −27.68 34.68 5 1200 表 2 各地层物理力学参数
地层类别 重度γ/(kN·m−3) 泊松比ν 内摩擦角φ/(°) 黏聚力c/kPa 压缩模量Es/MPa 地层平均厚度H/m 杂填土 18.62 0.33 6.80 19.40 4.50 3.49 淤泥 15.39 0.45 2.97 6.21 1.97 3.33 粉质黏土 18.43 0.33 9.44 21.58 4.51 3.17 中粗砂 18.62 0.22 30.00 0.00 9.50 5.04 炭质页岩 25.28 0.28 30.00 50.00 33.00 13.47 灰岩 26.26 − 45.49 1000.00 − 6.39 表 3 上升段曲线拟合结果
测点 上升段曲线拟合曲线 轴力预测值/kN 40℃ 45℃ G1-1 y=−129.11x−6189.7 −11354.1 −11999.7 G1-2 y=−230.31x−3746.2 −12958.6 −14110.2 G1-3 y=−112.52x−6507.6 −11008.4 −11571.0 G1-4 y=−168.1x−7653.2 −14377.2 −15217.7 表 4 下降段曲线拟合结果
测点 下降段曲线拟合曲线 轴力预测值/kN 25℃ 15℃ G1-1 y=−123.33x−6425.6 −9508.8 −8275.5 G1-2 y=−281.85x−1974.5 −9020.7 −6202.2 G1-3 y=−114.52x−6504.8 −9367.8 −8222.6 G1-4 y=−186.47x−7292.5 −11954.2 −10089.5 -
[1] 向 艳. 温度应力对深基坑支护结构内力与变形的影响研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2014,36(S2):64-69. [2] 金亚兵,沈 翔,劳丽燕. 温度变化对深基坑内支撑轴力和变形的影响研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2021,43(8):1417-1425. [3] 曲晶彤. 温度对地铁深基坑支护结构及周边建筑群的影响研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳建筑大学, 2020. [4] 王 莹. 内支撑体系温度效益对深基坑变形的影响分析[J]. 天津建设科技,2019,29(3):65-67. [5] 魏星星. 高温差对呼和浩特地铁基坑支撑温度效应影响分析[D]. 北京: 中国铁道科学研究院, 2018. [6] 宋亮亮. 基坑支护内支撑结构温度影响研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江科技学院, 2017. [7] 甘朝锋. 温度应力对深基坑支护结构的影响分析−以某工程为例定[J]. 福建质量管理,2016,(5):127-129. [8] 刘 畅,张亚龙,郑 刚,等. 季节性温度变化对某深大基坑工程的影响分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2016,38(4):627-635. [9] 成怡冲,吴才德,艾智勇,等. 环境温度变化对地铁车站深基坑受力影响分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2016,19(11):17-21. [10] 钟思成. 时间效应对钢筋混凝土支撑轴力的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术,2020,57(S1):1293-1297.