Stability Analysis and Reinforcement Design for Soil-like Slope in Operating Highway
-
摘要: 某高速公路类土质边坡表层为坡积土,下伏强风化—弱风化泥页岩,公路营运巡检中发现该边坡出现变形破坏迹象。对该类土质边坡变形破坏发展过程、成因及稳定性进行分析研究,研究结果表明,该边坡破坏形式为浅层牵引式滑坡,分别利用有限元强度折减法和瑞典圆弧滑动面法对边坡的稳定性进行分析计算,计算结果显示,正常工况下和非正常工况I(暴雨)下边坡都处于不稳定状态,经综合分析结合稳定性计算,提出采用封闭坡表裂缝+预应力锚杆格梁+仰斜排水孔进行治理,加固后的监测数据验证了边坡的稳定性和治理方案的可靠性。研究成果可为类土质边坡滑坡灾害防治提供参考。Abstract: The surface layer of a highway soil-like slope is colluvial soil, underlying strongly weathered-weakly weathered clay shale. It was found that the slope showed signs of deformation and failure in highway operation inspection. The development process, causes and stability of deformation and failure of this soil-like slope were analyzed and studied, the finite element strength reduction method and the circular sliding surface method were used respectively. The results show that the failure mode of the slope is a shallow traction landslide. The calculation results show that the slope is in an unstable state under normal conditions, and abnormal conditions I (rainstorm). Through comprehensive analysis combined with stability calculation, the closed slope surface cracks, prestressed anchor pile with beam, and inclined drainage holes are proposed for treatment. The monitoring data after reinforcement verifies the stability of the slope and the reliability of the regulation plan. The research results can provide a reference for the prevention and control of landslide disasters in soil-like slopes.
-
Key words:
- highway /
- soil-like slope /
- anchor pile /
- strength reduction method /
- safety factor
-
表 1 边坡岩土体力学参数
岩土名称 计算
工况弹性模量
/MPa泊松
比重度/
(kN·m−3)内摩擦
角/(°)黏聚力
/kPa强风化泥页岩 自然 5.5 0.25 23 26 18 暴雨 24.2 19 14 中等风化泥页岩 自然 50 0.25 24.5 30 28 暴雨 25 24 23 弱风化泥页岩 自然 3000 0.2 26 34.8 35 暴雨 26.5 28 30 滑移面 11 32 表 2 材料参数
材料 弹性模量/MPa 泊松比 重度/
(kN·m−3)本构模型 框架梁 28 0.2 25 弹性 预应力锚杆 210 0.3 78 弹性 -
[1] 赵晓彦. 类土质边坡特性及其锚固设计理论研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2005. [2] 何其胜. 贵州某高大类土质路堑边坡稳定性数值分析[D]. 天津: 河北工业大学, 2020. [3] 田华兵. 某泥质粉砂岩类土质高边坡的滑坡治理研究[J]. 路基工程,2020,(6):202-205. doi: 10.13379/j.issn.1003-8825.201912045 [4] 李子光. 花岗岩类土质边坡特性及稳定性分析[J]. 西部探矿工程,2021,33(2):32-34,38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5716.2021.02.011 [5] 杨逸飞,孙少锐,闵 望,等. 顺层岩质边坡稳定性分析及加固设计研究[J]. 岩土工程技术,2023,37(1):66-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2023.01.012 [6] 宋克英,张 启,薛润坤. 轨道交通停车场超高山体边坡工程设计与实践[J]. 岩土工程技术,2021,35(4):260-264. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2021.04.010 [7] 左昌群,徐 颖,丁少林,等. 类土质滑坡稳定性影响因素及其相互作用规律研究[J]. 水土保持研究,2015,22(3):325-330. doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2015.03.059 [8] 李满意,周洪燕,魏燕珍,等. 类土质边坡失稳机理分析与稳定性研究[J]. 长江科学院院报,2016,33(5):111-115. doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20150140 [9] 刘海亭,朱有禄,杨 鹏,等. 高边坡稳定性评价及治理措施分析研究[J]. 岩土工程技术,2023,37(1):60-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2023.01.011 [10] 马 波,顾生泉,葛鸿辉. 强度折减法在某核电站泵房边坡分析中的应用[J]. 岩土工程技术,2016,30(4):193-198. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2016.04.008 [11] JTG D 30—2015 公路路基设计规范[S].