Cause Analysis and Comprehensive Treatment of Back Mountain Landslide Slope of Bailian Temple in Ningde
-
摘要: 宁德白莲寺后山滑坡为中型牵引式土质滑坡,是典型的由于坡脚不合理开挖叠加强降雨作用导致的滑坡。根据勘查成果,采用圆弧法和有限元法对滑坡进行稳定性分析,分析结果显示,一般工况下滑坡处于基本稳定状态,暴雨工况下滑坡处于不稳定—欠稳定状态。滑坡治理采用削坡卸载、锚杆框架梁、植被防护、抗滑桩、坡脚挡墙及设置截排水沟等综合治理措施,治理效果较好,可为类似滑坡工程提供参考。Abstract: The back mountain landslide of Bailian Temple in Ningde is a medium-sized traction type soil landslide, which is a typical landslide caused by unreasonable excavation at the foot of the slope and heavy rainfall. According to the survey results, the arc method and finite element method were used to analyze the stability of the landslide. The analysis results show that the landslide is basically stable under general conditions, and unstable - understable under rainstorm conditions. The landslide treatment adopts comprehensive measures such as slope cutting and unloading, anchor frame beams, vegetation protection, anti-slip piles, retaining walls, and setting up interception and drainage ditches. The treatment effect is good and can provide reference for similar landslide projects.
-
Key words:
- landslide /
- saturated stagnant water zone /
- arc method /
- finite element /
- stability evaluation /
- anchor bar /
- anti-slip pile
-
表 1 岩土体物理力学指标参数表
岩土层名称 重度γ/(kN.m−3) 黏聚力c /kPa 内摩擦角φ/(°) 含碎石黏性土② 17.8 15 17 碎块石②-1 18.9 0 30 凝灰熔岩残积土③ 18.6 13.7(天然) 24.37(天然) 11.35(饱和) 20.52(饱和) 10.21(残余) 13.11(残余) 全风化凝灰熔岩 19.0 30 28 表 2 稳定性计算结果
剖面 工况 稳定系数Fs 安全系数 稳定状态 1-1′ 一般 1.086 1.30 基本稳定 暴雨 1.012 1.15 欠稳定 2-2′ 一般 1.066 1.30 基本稳定 暴雨 0.976 1.15 不稳定 3-3′ 一般 1.076 1.30 基本稳定 暴雨 0.989 1.15 不稳定 4-4′ 一般 1.066 1.30 基本稳定 暴雨 1.027 1.15 欠稳定 5-5′ 一般 1.075 1.30 基本稳定 暴雨 1.028 1.15 欠稳定 -
[1] 乔 兰, 姜 波, 庞林祥, 等. 降雨入渗对板岩边坡稳定的影响及加固措施研究[J]. 岩土力学,2015,36(S2):545-550. [2] 唐荣昌, 钱 洪. 活断层的地质研究及其在工程安全 性评价的意义[J]. 四川地震,1994(1):69-70. [3] FREDLUND D G, RAHARDJO H. Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils[M]. Ottawa: John Wiley & Sons, 1993. [4] 肖 超, 金福喜, 刘海鸿, 等. 开挖与降雨作用下边坡失稳机理及模拟分析[J]. 工程地质学报,2012,20(1):37-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2012.01.006 [5] 刘震涛, 尚彦军, 邵 鹏, 等. 降雨与开挖联合作用下边坡位移矢量及速率变化分析—以韩江高陂水利枢纽右岸尾水渠边坡为例[J]. 工程地质学报,2020,28(1):122-131. [6] 蒋 涛, 崔圣华, 冉 耀. 开挖和降雨耦合诱发滑坡机理分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2023, 34(3): 20-29. [7] MEIN R G, LARSON C L. Modeling infiltration during a steady rain[J]. Water Resources Research,1973,9(2):384-394. doi: 10.1029/WR009i002p00384 [8] BODMAN G B, COLEMAN E A. Moisture and energy condition during downward entry of water into soil[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1994,8(2):166-182. [9] ANDARA S, FERRARI A, LALOUI L. Modeling landslides in unsaturated slopes subjected to rainfall infiltration using material point method[J]. International Journal for Numerical & Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,2016,40(9):1358-1380. [10] DAI F C, LEE C F, NGAI Y Y. Landslide risk assessment and management-an overview[J]. Engineering Geology,2002,64(1):65-87. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00093-X [11] 王述红, 何 坚, 杨天娇. 考虑降雨入渗的边坡稳定性数值分析[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版),2018,39(8):1196-1200. doi: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2018.08.026 [12] 马世国, 韩同春, 徐日庆, 等. 强降雨条件下含倾斜基岩层的边坡稳定分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,46(7):2673-2678. [13] 连继峰, 罗 强, 蒋良潍, 等. 顺坡渗流条件下土质边坡浅层稳定分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2015,37(8):1440-1448. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201508012 [14] 胡立雄, 白会人. 降雨入渗的边坡稳定评价方法[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报,2007(2):235-237. [15] 裴向军, 袁 广, 张晓超, 等. 坡脚开挖诱发滑坡机理—以沙井驿滑坡为例[J]. 山地学报,2017,35(2):195-202. [16] 晏鄂川, 唐辉明. 工程岩体稳定性评价与利用[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 2002. [17] 孙子涵 , 王述红 , 杨天娇 , 等. 降雨条件下多层土坡入渗机理与稳定性分析[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版),2020,41(8):1201-1208.