Mechanical Characteristics of Slight-Expansive Soil in Hefei and its Effect by Saturation Disturbance
-
摘要: 为了研究合肥地区弱膨胀土遇水及扰动对其强度和变形等力学性质的影响,对合肥地铁7号线徽富路站深基坑内弱膨胀土的原状样及饱和扰动样,分别开展了50 kPa,100 kPa和200 kPa三种围压下常规饱和三轴压缩(CTC)和三轴拉伸(CTE)以及原状非浸水样双压力室三轴压缩试验。通过对比原状样与饱和扰动样的应力–应变、强度指标以及变形模量的差异,探讨了饱水扰动对膨胀土力学性质的影响,且采用XRD衍射测试了膨胀土的矿物成分及含量。试验结果表明:(1)合肥地铁7号线基坑土质为弱膨胀土,黏土矿物中蒙脱石含量占46%;(2)合肥地铁7号线基坑的弱膨胀土强度的降低主要表现为黏聚力的降低,原状样较扰动饱和重塑样黏聚力下降了56%,而内摩擦角的变化并不显著;(3)合肥地铁7号线基坑内弱膨胀土有超固结现象,表现为原状样具有剪胀软化特征;(4)合肥地铁7号线基坑弱膨胀土原状样遇水扰动后初始模量下降了20%左右,水的浸润大幅降低了膨胀土抗变形能力。Abstract: To study the influence of water and disturbance on the strength and deformation of weak-expansive soil in the Hefei area, the undisturbed samples and saturated disturbed samples of weak-expansive soil in the deep foundation pit of Huifu Road Station of Hefei Metro Line 7 were subjected to conventional saturated triaxial compression (CTC) and triaxial tension (CTE) under three confining pressures of 50 kPa, 100 kPa and 200 kPa, and the undisturbed non-immersed samples were subjected to a triaxial compression test. By comparing the differences of stress-strain, strength index, and deformation modulus between undisturbed and saturated disturbed samples, the influence of saturated disturbance on the mechanical properties of expansive soil was discussed, and the mineral composition and content of expansive soil were tested by XRD diffraction. The test results show that: (1) The soil of the foundation pit of Hefei Metro Line 7 is cohesive weak expansive soil, and the montmorillonite content in clay minerals accounts for 46%. (2) The decrease of cohesion mainly manifests the decrease of strength of Hefei weak-expansive soil. The cohesion of the undisturbed sample is 56% lower than that of the disturbed saturated remolded sample, while the friction angle change is insignificant. (3) The weak-expansive soil in the foundation pit of Hefei Metro Line 7 has the phenomenon of over-consolidation, characterized by the dilatancy softening of the undisturbed sample. (4) The initial modulus of Hefei weak-expansive soil decreased by about 20% after water disturbance, and water infiltration significantly reduced the deformation resistance of expansive soil.
-
表 1 土样基本物理性质
比重 含水率/% 液限/% 塑限/% 塑性指数 自由膨胀率/% 2.716 21.7 57.2 25.3% 31.9 55.6 表 2 膨胀土膨胀潜势划分
自由膨胀率$ {\mathrm{\delta }}_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}} $/% 膨胀潜势 $ {40\le \mathrm{\delta }}_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}} < 65 $ 弱 $ {65\le \mathrm{\delta }}_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}} < 90 $ 中 $ {\mathrm{\delta }}_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}}\ge 90 $ 强 表 3 试验方案
试验
编号取样深度
/m试验类型 围压
/kPa试验条件 1 13 双压力室三轴压缩(CTC) 50 原状样 2 100 3 200 4 18 双压力室三轴压缩(CTC) 50 5 100 6 200 7 13 单压力室三轴压缩(CTC) 50 饱和扰动样 8 100 9 200 13 13 单压力室三轴拉伸(CTE) 50 14 100 15 200 -
[1] 陈炜韬, 董宇苍, 方 霖, 等. 合肥膨胀土地层浅埋双洞地铁隧道施工参数优化研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2018,38(2):191-198. [2] 孙长龙, 殷宗泽, 王福升, 等. 膨胀土性质研究综述[J]. 水利水电科技进展,1995,15(6):11-15. [3] 包承纲. 南水北调中线工程膨胀土渠坡稳定问题及对策[J]. 人民长江,2003,34(5):4-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2003.05.003 [4] 李生林, 施 斌, 杜延军. 中国膨胀土工程地质研究[J]. 自然杂志,1997,19(2):82-86. [5] 廖世文. 膨胀土与铁路工程[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 1984. [6] KARALIS T K. On the elastic deformation of non-saturated swelling Mechanica, 1990, 84(2): 19-45. [7] DOBROWOLSKY M, VRETTOS C. Assessment of swelling deformation of unsaturated Kaolinite clay. In: Experimental Unsaturated Soil Mechanics[C]. Springer Proceedings in Physics, 2007, 112(3): 285-293. [8] CUI S L, DU Y F, WANG X P, et al. Influence of temperature on swelling deformation characteristic of compacted GMZ bentonite-sand mixtures[J]. Journal of Central South University,2018,25(2):2819-2830. [9] 王春周. 荆门城南区域膨胀土膨缩特性及抗剪强度研究[J]. 中国勘察设计,2021(2):104-107. [10] 谭 波, 徐 良, 李亚奇. 南宁灰白重塑膨胀土三向膨胀室内试验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程,2020,20(35):14612-14618. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.35.039 [11] 崔 伟, 李华銮, 穆乃敏. 石灰改性膨胀土工程性质的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2003,24(4):606-609. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2003.04.025 [12] 戴福初, 董文萍, 黄志全, 等. 南水北调中线段原状膨胀土抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 工程科学与技术,2018,50(6):123-131. [13] 童 军, 胡 波, 龚壁卫. 原状膨胀土直剪特性研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2016,12(3):613-617. [14] 李新明, 贾亚垒, 王志留, 等. 原状膨胀土剪切力学特性的应变速率效应[J]. 岩土力学,2022,43(12):1-9. [15] 杨 庆, 张慧珍, 栾茂田. 非饱和膨胀土抗剪强度的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(3):420-425. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.03.011 [16] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 等. 合肥膨胀土动弹性模量与阻尼比试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报,2020,54(4):759-76. [17] 张爱军, 哈岸英, 骆亚生. 压实膨胀土的膨胀变形规律与计算模式[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(7):1236-1241. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.07.026 [18] 曾召田, 刘发标, 吕海波, 等. 干湿交替环境下膨胀土变形试验研究[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报,2015,13(3):72-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1144.2015.03.014 [19] GB/T 50123—2019 土工试验方法标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019. [20] GB 50112—2013 膨胀土地区建筑技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2013.