Volume 36 Issue 1
Feb.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE  > 2022  >  36(1): 10-15
Huang Lijing, An Xiaojing, Ren Yali. Dynamic Response Analysis and Comparison of Two Different Types of Underground Cavern Structures[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2022, 36(1): 10-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.01.002
Citation: Huang Lijing, An Xiaojing, Ren Yali. Dynamic Response Analysis and Comparison of Two Different Types of Underground Cavern Structures[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2022, 36(1): 10-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.01.002
shu

Dynamic Response Analysis and Comparison of Two Different Types of Underground Cavern Structures

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.01.002

  • Institute of Defense Engineering, AMS, PLA, Beijing 100036, China

  • Received Date: 2020-12-15
  • Publish Date: 2022-02-16
    Abstract
  • The stability of surrounding rock is related to the structure of the cavern. The dynamic response of deep buried dome cavern structure and straight wall-arch cavern structure under the explosive loadings was studied by numerical analysis, and the deformation and the failure mode of the two structures were analyzed and compared. The analysis results show that the overall deformation and the ratio of horizontal and vertical deformation of dome cavern structure is better than the straight wall-arch cavern structure. Dome cavern structure has much larger failure load. The conclusions can be used for reference in related projects.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(15)
  • [1]
    朱维申,李晓静,郭彦双,等. 大型地下洞室群稳定性的系统性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(10):1689-1693. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.10.018
    [2]
    朱维申,孙爱花,王文涛,等. 大型洞室群高边墙位移预测和围岩稳定性判别方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(9):1729-1731. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.09.001
    [3]
    袁 亮,顾金才,薛俊华,等. 深部围岩分区破裂化模型试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2014,39(6):987-993.
    [4]
    高延法,王 军,黄万朋,等. 直墙半圆拱形钢管混凝土支架力学性能实验及应用[J]. 隧道建设,2014,34(1):6-12.
    [5]
    高延法, 王　波, 王　军, 等. 深井软岩巷道钢管混凝土支护结构性能试验及应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报 2010, 29(S1) : 2604-2609.
    [6]
    张永兴. 岩石力学 [M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2004.
    [7]
    GB 50086—2001　锚杆喷射混凝土支护技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2001.
    [8]
    崔晓强,郭彦林,朱忠义. 穹顶结构体系[J]. 空间结构,2001,7(1):3-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6578.2001.01.001
    [9]
    姚 庆,张亚栋,安笑静. 爆炸荷载作用下穹顶洞室动力响应的数值模拟研究[J]. 防护工程,2017,39(6):53-59.
    [10]
    顾金才, 沈　俊. 喷锚支护模型试验研究报告 [C]//中国土木工程学会防护工程学会理事会学术交流会. 1988.
    [11]
    郑颖人, 朱合华, 方正昌, 等. 地下工程围岩稳定分析与设计理论 [M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2012.
    [12]
    顾金才. 均质材料中几种洞室的破坏形态[J]. 防护工程,1979,(2):6-11.
    [13]
    王承树. 动载下围岩与坑道喷锚支护的相互作用 [C]//全国首届结构与介质相互作用学术会议论文集. 1993.
    [14]
    徐景茂,顾金才,陈安敏,等. 爆炸平面波作用下大跨度洞室稳定性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2013,34(S1):47-53.
    [15]
    赵跃堂,方长海,田绪坤. 大跨度深埋洞室动力响应分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2010,(S1):3301-3307.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(1)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (93) PDF downloads(21) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Geotechnical Engineering Technique京ICP备12043220号-2

    Address：No.79 Xibianmen Inner Street (Xibianmennei Dajie), Xicheng District, 100053, Beijing, P. R. China（100053）Tel：010-83117072 / 010-83196888Fax：（010）83117582Email：get099@263.net

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return