Volume 36 Issue 6
Dec.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Zhou Chunguo, Wang Rongfu, Liu Xingtang, Feng Lei, Liu Gang. Study on Blasting Relaxation Test and Stability Influence of Underground Powerhouse Rock Wall Beam[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2022, 36(6): 502-506. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.06.014
Citation: Zhou Chunguo, Wang Rongfu, Liu Xingtang, Feng Lei, Liu Gang. Study on Blasting Relaxation Test and Stability Influence of Underground Powerhouse Rock Wall Beam[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2022, 36(6): 502-506. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.06.014

Study on Blasting Relaxation Test and Stability Influence of Underground Powerhouse Rock Wall Beam

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.06.014
  • Received Date: 2021-06-10
  • Publish Date: 2022-12-08
  • In view of the difficulty in forming the surrounding rock in the rock wall beam area under special geological structures, and the difficulty of assessing the stability of the rock wall beam, a blasting test and sonic test were carried out in the rock wall beam area of an engineering to study the reinforcement measures and stress in the rock beam area. The depth of the relaxation zone was used to modify the results of the stability evaluation of rock wall beams through experimental data modification. The results show that the average depth of the relaxation zone at each measuring point before blasting is 1.73 m, and the average depth of each measuring point after blasting is about 2.51 m. Comparing the results of each test section, the rock wall beam resin anchor pre-reinforcement scheme has a better surrounding rock forming effect. Use the test data to recheck the surrounding rock and structural surface parameters, and modify the numerical simulation calculation results. The safety factor of anti-sliding stability of the rock wall crane beam and the joint surface of the rock wall is 6.89 when the depth of the stress relaxation zone is not considered. When considering the depth of stress relaxation zone, the safety factor is reduced to 3.13, and the rock wall beam is in a stable state. The blasting relaxation test method and stability calculation method of rock wall beam can provide reference for similar projects.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    洪 燕,田正宏,孙 啸,等. 碾压混凝土薄弱区域压实质量精细评价方法[J]. 水电能源科学,2021,39(4):80-83.
    [2]
    邱 鑫,林 缅,郑思平,等. 基于Voronoi模型的脆性岩石微观结构数值模拟[J]. 力学与实践,2021,43(2):244-251. doi: 10.6052/1000-0879-20-433
    [3]
    张开雨,夏开文,刘 丰. 基于Voronoi多边形离散的DDA方法模拟岩石破坏[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2021,40(4):725-738.
    [4]
    孙治新,赵 秋,赵洪鹏. 应用干孔声波法测试隧洞围岩松弛圈[J]. 水利水电工程设计,2019,38(1):36-37,56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6980.2019.01.013
    [5]
    李 月,刘 立,梁 伟,等. 岩石松动层声波测试技术[J]. 西华大学学报(自然科学版),2006,(2):95-96,102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-159X.2006.02.030
    [6]
    刘康和. 弹性波测试技术的应用与分析[J]. 人民长江,1991,(7):18-21. doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.1991.07.005
    [7]
    冷振东,卢文波,范 勇,等. 侧向起爆条件下的爆炸能量分布及其对破岩效果的影响[J]. 爆炸与冲击,2017,37(4):661-669.
    [8]
    冷振东,卢文波,陈 明,等. 岩石钻孔爆破粉碎区计算模型的改进[J]. 爆炸与冲击,2015,35(1):101-107. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0101-07
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (53) PDF downloads(9) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return