Volume 37 Issue 6
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Deng Ye, Li Yi, Chen Yiren, Zheng Hao, Li Lulu, Jiang Yulu. Evaluation Method of Loose Characteristics of EPB Shield Slag Considering the Formation Heterogeneity and Plastic Fluidization Process[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2023, 37(6): 644-648. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2023.06.003
Citation: Deng Ye, Li Yi, Chen Yiren, Zheng Hao, Li Lulu, Jiang Yulu. Evaluation Method of Loose Characteristics of EPB Shield Slag Considering the Formation Heterogeneity and Plastic Fluidization Process[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2023, 37(6): 644-648. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2023.06.003

Evaluation Method of Loose Characteristics of EPB Shield Slag Considering the Formation Heterogeneity and Plastic Fluidization Process

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2023.06.003
  • Received Date: 2022-08-16
  • Publish Date: 2023-12-08
  • Accurate assessment of the EPB shield slag is conducive to the determination of the slag treatment process, treatment capacity, and treatment cost. Based on the three-phase composition theory of soil in soil mechanics, it analyzes the calculation principle of the loose characteristics of slag soil and deduces the evaluation formula, and forms the evaluation method of the loose characteristics of the slag soil of EPB shield. Based on the geotechnical test (density and water content test), the coefficient of looseness was determined by this evaluation method and compared with the engineering measurement results. The results show that the loose coefficient of the slag soil without considering the formation unevenness and plastic fluidization is 1.50, the loose coefficient only considering the formation unevenness is 1.52, the loose coefficient only considering the formation plastic fluidization is 1.53, the loose coefficient considering the formation unevenness and plastic fluidization is 1.54, and the loose coefficient obtained by the actual measurement of the project is 1.64. It can be seen that the plastic fluidization process is the main factor and the formation unevenness is the secondary factor. The results are in good agreement with the actual measurement results. This method provides a basic data acquisition method for the accurate prediction of the amount of residual soil.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    HAVIR J,BORDIA S K,PETROS V. A simple method of determining the coefficient of loosening of rocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts,1971,8(2):97-103.
    [2]
    王树英,刘朋飞,胡钦鑫,等. 盾构隧道渣土改良理论与技术研究综述[J]. 中国公路学报,2020,33(5):8-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2020.05.002
    [3]
    亓 帅, 张 骏, 许伟杰, 等. 北京城区几种典型土层的松散特性研究[C]// 北京力学会第19届学术年会论文集, 2013: 589-590.
    [4]
    李蔭純. 松散系数簡易測定法[J]. 地质与勘探,1959,(3):18.
    [5]
    李广信, 张丙印. 土力学(第二版)[M] . 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2013.
    [6]
    GBT 50123—2019 土工试验方法标准[S]. 2019.
    [7]
    WU Y,MOONEY A,CHA M. An experimental examination of foam stability under pressure for EPB TBM tunneling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research,2018,77:80-93.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (91) PDF downloads(9) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return