Volume 38 Issue 1
Feb.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Ji Haifeng, Liu Weijing, Zhao Guoliang, Niu Yuzhe, Xiao Fengchun, Jiang Yusheng, Yang Xing. Research on Conditioning Method of Gravel Soil in Qingdao Metro Shield Construction[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2024, 38(1): 7-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.01.002
Citation: Ji Haifeng, Liu Weijing, Zhao Guoliang, Niu Yuzhe, Xiao Fengchun, Jiang Yusheng, Yang Xing. Research on Conditioning Method of Gravel Soil in Qingdao Metro Shield Construction[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2024, 38(1): 7-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.01.002

Research on Conditioning Method of Gravel Soil in Qingdao Metro Shield Construction

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.01.002
  • Received Date: 2022-06-21
  • Accepted Date: 2023-07-14
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-03-13
  • Available Online: 2024-02-05
  • Publish Date: 2024-02-05
  • Shield tunneling in gravel stratum is often faced with many difficulties such as large torque of cutterhead, tool wear, and poor slag. Aiming at the research problem of reasonable conditioning index of gravel soil, the typical gravel soil layer of Qingdao Metro Line 4 is taken as the research object. Firstly, the basic characteristics of gravel soil are evaluated by particle screening, LCPC test, and permeability test. Five groups of gravel soil conditioning schemes were designed based on the traditional conditioning schemes of sand and clay soil. Slump test, permeability test, and direct shear test were carried out to analyze the flow plasticity, permeability and shear resistance characteristics of gravel soil with different conditioning indices. Finally, the best scheme of foam and polymer combination conditioning was verified according to the variation of torque of the shield machine in practical engineering. The results show that the mixture of 7% foam and 5% polymer can effectively reduce the permeability coefficient of gravel soil, maintain certain plasticity, and play a role in reducing the torque of the cutterhead and improving tunneling efficiency.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    徐琳琳,余 金,蒋亚龙,等. 泡沫性能测试及其在富水砂层渣土改良中应用[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(S1):345-353.
    [2]
    邱 龑,杨新安,唐卓华,等. 富水砂层土压平衡盾构施工渣土改良试验[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(11):1703-1708. doi: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2015.11.014
    [3]
    刘 飞,杨小龙,冉江陵,等. 基于盾构掘进效果的富水砾砂地层渣土改良试验研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2020,40(10):1426-1432.
    [4]
    胡长明,崔 耀,王雪艳,等. 土压平衡盾构施工穿越砂层渣土改良试验研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2013,45(6):761-766. doi: 10.15986/j.1006-7930.2013.06.006
    [5]
    黄志强,冯东林. 生石灰膨润土泥浆土压盾构渣土改良试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2020,16(1):128-133.
    [6]
    刘朋飞,王树英,阳军生,等. 渣土改良剂对黏土液塑限影响及机理分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,2018,50(6):91-96. doi: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201707025
    [7]
    王洪新,陈大羽,商涛平,等. 土压平衡盾构渣土改良的合理坍落度研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(1):148-157,188.
    [8]
    王明胜,路军富,罗奥雷. 粉质黏土地层隧道盾构施工渣土改良剂试验[J]. 铁道工程学报,2020,37(5):74-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2020.05.014
    [9]
    李 杰,郭京波,戴树合,等. 复合地层盾构施工中泡沫对刀盘扭矩的影响分析及参数优化[J]. 隧道建设,2016,36(8):906-910. doi: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2016.08.003
    [10]
    SUN Z,YANG Z,JIANG Y,et al. Influence of particle size distribution, test time, and moisture content on sandy stratum LCPC abrasivity test results[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2020,80(1):611-625.
    [11]
    HU W,ROSTAMI J. A new method to quantify rheology of conditioned soil for application in EPB TBM tunneling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2020,96:103192. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103192
    [12]
    丁彦杰. 高压富水砂层土压平衡盾构的土体改良技术研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2020.
    [13]
    陈青生,李宇轩,肖衡林,等. 考虑颗粒级配影响的高聚物改良钙质砂抗剪强度特性试验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程,2020,20(28):11718-11724. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.28.047
    [14]
    申兴柱,高 锋,王 帆,等. 土压平衡盾构穿越透水砾砂层渣土改良试验研究[J]. 铁道标准设计,2017,61(4):121-125. doi: 10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.2017.04.026
    [15]
    孟宪雷. 土压平衡盾构区段粉质黏土渣土改良技术探讨[J]. 现代城市轨道交通,2020,(2):54-57.
    [16]
    YANG Z Y,YANG X,DING Y J,et al. Characteristics of conditioned sand for EPB shield and its influence on cutterhead torque[J]. Acta Geotechnica,2022,17(12):5813-5828. doi: 10.1007/s11440-022-01666-7
    [17]
    YANG X,YANG Z Y,ZHANG X Y,et al. Experimental study on the influences of water content, consolidation time, and soil conditioning on the adhesion of clay in EPB shields[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2022,81(10):426. doi: 10.1007/s10064-022-02941-3
    [18]
    张润来,宫全美,周顺华,等. 砂卵石地层土压平衡盾构施工渣土改良试验[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(5):673-680. doi: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2019.05.012
    [19]
    王树英,令凡琳,黄 硕. 泡沫改良粗粒渣土渗透性计算模型及适用性对比研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2021,40(11):2357-2365. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.1141
    [20]
    郭文琦,王士民,刘川昆,等. 淤泥质土及其改良土体动力特性试验研究[J]. 铁道标准设计,2019,63(11):121-125. doi: 10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.201901190001
    [21]
    叶朝良,谢玉芳,曹风旭,等. 饱和状态下海积软土一维渗透固结特征试验研究[J]. 铁道标准设计,2021,65(3):28-33. doi: 10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.201912040003
    [22]
    杨玉玲,杜延军,范日东,等. 分散剂改良土–膨润土竖向隔离墙材料黏度试验研究[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,44(3):650-654. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2014.03.035
    [23]
    张 研,梁卓悦,廖逸夫. 基于相关向量机的富水砂层渣土改良试验效果预测[J]. 科学技术与工程,2021,21(17):7293-7298. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2021.17.045
    [24]
    郭付军,赵振威,张 杰,等. 使用聚合物对纯砂层进行渣土改良的试验研究[J]. 隧道建设,2017,37(S1):53-58. doi: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2017.S1.009
    [25]
    杨志勇,乐贵平,江玉生,等. 北京地区典型地层土压平衡盾构渣土改良技术[J]. 施工技术,2017,46(1):58-60,79.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (94) PDF downloads(21) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return