Volume 38 Issue 5
Oct.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE  > 2024  >  38(5): 533-538
Zhao Shuqiang, Cao Pulin, Hu Xinrui, Jia Ziheng. Function Assessment Method for Underground Pipe Trench of Ancient Architectural Drainage System in the Forbidden City[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2024, 38(5): 533-538. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.05.005
Citation: Zhao Shuqiang, Cao Pulin, Hu Xinrui, Jia Ziheng. Function Assessment Method for Underground Pipe Trench of Ancient Architectural Drainage System in the Forbidden City[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2024, 38(5): 533-538. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.05.005
shu

Function Assessment Method for Underground Pipe Trench of Ancient Architectural Drainage System in the Forbidden City

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.05.005

  • China Ordnance Industry Survey and Geotechnical Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100053, China

  • Received Date: 2023-07-19
  • Accepted Date: 2024-07-30
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-06-07
    • Available Online: 2024-10-09
  • Publish Date: 2024-10-09
    Abstract
  • The underground pipe trench of ancient architectural drainage system is an important component of ancient buildings, and its function degradation is common after a long historical process. Before taking protective measures, it is necessary to conduct a functional assessment of the pipe trench. Taking the underground pipe trench of the drainage system of the Forbidden City as an example, a unit scoring method and a section method for the assessment of the pipe trench were proposed, and the specific implementation of the methods was given. The characteristics of the two methods in terms of data collection, analysis and assessment, and adaptability were compared. This provides a reference for the practice and research of the assessment of the underground pipe trench of ancient architectural drainage system.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(16)
  • [1]
    单霁翔. 故宫排水系统营造与维护中的“工匠精神”[J]. 北京规划建设,2017(2):64-66.
    [2]
    杜 预. 城镇排水管道状况评估协议与预测模型研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2022.
    [3]
    龙 浩, 李翠梅. 城市雨水管网系统脆弱性评价[J]. 深圳大学学报(理工版),2014,31(6):593-599.
    [4]
    操海璐. 基于GIS的赣州市宋代排水系统的数字化重现与新城区防涝强度评价研究[J]. 科技创新与应用,2021,11(27):106-109.
    [5]
    KIRKHAM R, KEARNEY P D, ROGERS K J, et al. PIRAT-A system for quantitative sewer pipe assessment[J]. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2000, 19(11): 1033-1053.
    [6]
    张 珺. 论排水管道的检测及评价方法[J]. 给水排水,2011,47(S1):418-420.
    [7]
    卞 坤, 韩腾飞, 李永录. 排水管道的CCTV质量检测与评估[C]//第三届全国工程质量学术交流会论文集. 2010: 71-76.
    [8]
    李 田, 郑瑞东, 朱 军. 排水管道检测技术的发展现状[J]. 中国给水排水,2006(12):11-13.
    [9]
    CJJ 181—2012 城镇排水管道检测与评估技术规程[S].
    [10]
    余蔚茗, 李树平, 田建强. 中国古代排水系统初探[J]. 中国水利,2007(4):51-53,56
    [11]
    何 颖, 韦义洋. 徽州古村落水环境空间分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2012,40(20):10479-10482.
    [12]
    王金根. 隋唐大运河通济渠与沿岸聚落空间关系研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2012.
    [13]
    周维楠. 阳泉市古村落传统水环境设施营建特色研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2018.
    [14]
    王帅敏. 太行山区古村落传统水环境设施营建技艺及其适应性更新研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2021.
    [15]
    张少钦, 李 俊. 基于现代排水理念的古建排水系统评估方法实证研究[C]//2016国际城市低影响开发(LID)学术大会, 2016: 70.
    [16]
    吴 珊, 李俊张, 张少钦. 一种古建筑渠道排水系统健康状况的综合评估方法[P]. CN201610964014.4, 2016-10-28.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(8)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (36) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Geotechnical Engineering Technique京ICP备12043220号-2

    Address：No.79 Xibianmen Inner Street (Xibianmennei Dajie), Xicheng District, 100053, Beijing, P. R. China（100053）Tel：010-83117072 / 010-83196888Fax：（010）83117582Email：get099@263.net

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return