Volume 38 Issue 6
Dec.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Wang Binghua, Li Wenqing, Wang Zhonghua, Meng Qingjun, Sun Feixiang. Disturbance Mechanism of Pipe-Jacking Construction on Surrounding Environment[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2024, 38(6): 672-679. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.06.006
Citation: Wang Binghua, Li Wenqing, Wang Zhonghua, Meng Qingjun, Sun Feixiang. Disturbance Mechanism of Pipe-Jacking Construction on Surrounding Environment[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2024, 38(6): 672-679. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.06.006

Disturbance Mechanism of Pipe-Jacking Construction on Surrounding Environment

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.06.006
  • Received Date: 2023-09-18
  • Accepted Date: 2024-03-11
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-11-21
  • Publish Date: 2024-12-06
  • To determine the impact of pipe-jacking construction on the surrounding environment, engineering data was collected and combined with case monitoring results to study the mechanism and laws of surface and existing tunnel deformation caused by pipe-jacking construction. The conclusions are as follows: (1) The settlement law of the surface section conforms to the Peck formula, with an influence range of about 1.4~2.6 times the diameter of the top pipe. The surface deformation development curve is divided into two forms: "uplift first and then settlement" and "full settlement". (2) The overall uplift of existing tunnels presents a "reverse" Peck curve, and the uplift amount was affected by the stiffness of the existing tunnel and the magnitude of the disturbance it is subjected to. With the increase of time, the uplift amount first increases rapidly and then tends to stabilize. (3) Monitoring and analysis were conducted on the pipe-jacking project of the existing tunnel, and the deformation patterns of the surface and tunnel were basically consistent with existing research patterns. Several measures were taken to control the deformation of the surface and existing tunnel, with a maximum settlement of about 11 mm on the surface and a maximum uplift of about 1.6 mm on the existing tunnel. The research results can provide certain references for the design and construction of related pipe-jacking.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    佘芳涛, 吴征奇, 周伟踪, 等. 考虑关键施工参数的矩形顶管隧道围岩变形控制分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2022,44(S1):247-253. doi: 10.11779/CJGE2022S1044
    [2]
    朱 剑, 李振勇, 张 泷. 复杂环境下大断面矩形顶管法施工过程地表沉降规律及控制措施研究[J]. 岩土工程技术,2017,31(1):49-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2017.01.012
    [3]
    丁传松. 大断面矩形顶管下穿合流污水箱涵变形分析[J]. 岩土工程技术,2023,37(1):1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2023.01.001
    [4]
    魏 纲, 徐日庆, 屠 玮. 顶管施工引起的土体扰动理论分析及试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004(3):476-482. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.03.022
    [5]
    郑 跃, 丁文其, 陈立生. 受顶管施工影响的土体扰动分析与实测研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2010,6(5):1015-1020. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0836.2010.05.024
    [6]
    刘浩航. 顶管上穿施工对既有地铁隧道的影响分析[D]. 湘潭: 湘潭大学, 2014.
    [7]
    李明宇, 王 松, 张维熙, 等. 大断面矩形顶管隧道施工引起的地面沉降分析[J]. 铁道建筑,2019,59(5):81-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2019.05.19
    [8]
    吴垠龙, 刘 维, 贾鹏蛟, 等. 矩形顶管近距离上穿既有隧道施工扰动分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2022,18(6):1968-1978.
    [9]
    徐 新, 付江山, 吴晓斌, 等. 矩形顶管施工引起的地表沉降研究[J]. 公路工程,2017,42(4):4-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0610.2017.04.002
    [10]
    魏 纲, 吴华君, 陈春来. 顶管施工中土体损失引起的沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学,2007(2):359-363. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2007.02.030
    [11]
    PECK R B. Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground[C]//7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and foundation Engineering. Mexico City, 1969: 225-290.
    [12]
    ATTEWELL P B, YEATES J, SELBY A R. Soil movements induced by tunnelling and their effects on pipelines and structures[M]. Glasgow: lackie, 1986: 10-50.
    [13]
    FANG Y S, LIN L S J, LIN L J S. Time and settlement in EPB shield tunnelling[J]. Tunnels & Tunnelling,1993,25(11):27-28.
    [14]
    方从启, 王承德. 顶管施工中的地面沉降及其估算[J]. 江苏理工大学学报,1998(4):108-112.
    [15]
    房营光, 莫海鸿, 张传英. 顶管施工扰动区土体变形的理论与实测分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2003(4):601-605. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2003.04.018
    [16]
    姜忻良, 赵志民, 李 园. 隧道开挖引起土层沉降槽曲线形态的分析与计算[J]. 岩土力学,2004(10):1542-1544. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2004.10.006
    [17]
    O'REILLY M P, NEW B M. Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom-their magnitude and prediction[M]. 1982.
    [18]
    MAIR R J, TAYLOR R N, BRACEGIRDLE A. Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays[J]. Geotechnique,1993,43(2):315-320. doi: 10.1680/geot.1993.43.2.315
    [19]
    韩 煊, 罗文林, 李 宁. 地铁隧道施工引起沉降槽宽度的影响因素[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2009,5(6):1188-1193,1219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0836.2009.06.023
    [20]
    JONES B D. Low-volume-loss tunnelling for London ring main extension[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering,2010,163(3):167-185. doi: 10.1680/geng.2010.163.3.167
    [21]
    董 俊. 地铁过街通道矩形顶管施工变形监测分析[J]. 铁道工程学报,2016,33(8):106-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2016.08.021
    [22]
    郑知斌, 李名淦, 闫朝涛, 等. 北京首条矩形顶管风险防控设计与沉降分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(4):1281-1290.
    [23]
    赵玉权. 深圳地铁10号线大断面矩形顶管施工控制技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2021.
    [24]
    王发民, 孟庆军, 张 浩, 等. 浅埋富水地层特大断面矩形顶管隧道掘进参数分析[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2023,43(2):316-326.
    [25]
    王蕴晨. 并行超大浅埋矩形顶管力学特性研究及工程应用[D]. 福州: 福建工程学院, 2020.
    [26]
    张 振. 超大矩形断面顶管隧洞开挖引起的地表沉降研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2016.
    [27]
    陈 杰. 四孔并行矩形顶管施工力学效应研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2015.
    [28]
    郑 斌. 大断面类矩形顶管壳体土压及顶进阻力分析——以上海淞沪路—三门路下立交工程为例[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2021,41(10):1740-1747.
    [29]
    韩占波, 豆小天, 曹伟明, 等. 浅覆土小间距矩形顶管施工地表变形控制技术[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2019,39(3):496-503.
    [30]
    叶耀东. 大断面矩形顶管近距离上穿地铁隧道变形控制探讨[J]. 城市道桥与防洪,2015(7):19,203-205. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7716.2015.07.062
    [31]
    张志伟, 梁荣柱, 高 坤, 等. 考虑管片环间接头弱化的新建隧道上穿引起既有盾构隧道纵向变形分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2022,41(S1):2955-2970.
    [32]
    李志南, 潘 珂, 王位赢. 并行顶管近距离上穿既有盾构隧道的安全分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2020,16(S2):939-944,975.
    [33]
    石 雷, 吴 宇, 殷茜东. 矩形顶管上穿运营隧道的施工参数控制分析[J]. 工程建设,2020,52(7):50-53.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(18)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (93) PDF downloads(20) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return