Volume 35 Issue 5
Oct.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
He Changming, Peng Gongxun. Differential Settlement Control of Road Bridge Transition Section in Deep Soft Soil Area[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2021, 35(5): 294-298. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2021.05.003
Citation: He Changming, Peng Gongxun. Differential Settlement Control of Road Bridge Transition Section in Deep Soft Soil Area[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2021, 35(5): 294-298. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2021.05.003

Differential Settlement Control of Road Bridge Transition Section in Deep Soft Soil Area

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2021.05.003
  • Received Date: 2020-08-05
  • Publish Date: 2021-10-22
  • The differential settlement of road bridge transition section seriously affects the safety and comfort of driving. According to the characteristics of deep soft soil area, such as large depth of soft foundation, high difficulty of soft foundation treatment and high cost, three differential settlement control schemes of rigid transition, flexible transition and rigid flexible combination transition are summarized. According to the three transition schemes, prestressed pipe pile composite foundation, vacuum preloading + air bubble mixed light soil embankment and long short pile composite foundation are respectively adopted for engineering practice. Combined with construction parameters and monitoring data, the reinforcement effect is analyzed and studied, and the technical and economic comparison of three transition schemes for soft foundation treatment is made. The results show that the three transition schemes are effective and feasible, but there are some differences in construction period, settlement control effect and economy. In general, when the filling height is fixed, the cost of rigid transition and rigid flexible transition is relatively high, and the greater the treatment depth, the more obvious the advantage of flexible transition in cost.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    陈亚东. 邢衡高速跨越构造物差异沉降控制技术研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2013.
    [2]
    吴昌胜,朱志铎. 沪苏浙高速公路软基处理评价[J]. 岩土工程学报,2017,37(1):105-108.
    [3]
    张 文. 桥头跳车原因分析及防治对策[J]. 路基工程,2007,(3):163-164. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8825.2007.03.078
    [4]
    秦鹏飞. CFG桩复合地基技术及其工程应用研究[J]. 岩土工程技术,2018,32(4):205-208. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2018.04.009
    [5]
    化建新,闫德刚,赵杰伟,等. 第七届全国岩土工程实录交流会特邀报告−地基处理综述及新进展[J]. 岩土工程技术,2015,29(6):285-300. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2015.06.004
    [6]
    郑俊杰,张 军,马 强,等. 路桥过渡段桩承式加筋路堤现场试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2012,34(2):356-362.
    [7]
    陈文平,谭存茂,杨和平. 气泡混合轻质土在台背回填施工中的应用[J]. 公路,2012,(11):162-165. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0451-0712.2012.11.036
    [8]
    刘代全. 刚柔过渡解决桥头跳车的理论和应用研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2001.
    [9]
    铁建设(2004)157号 京沪高速铁路设计暂行规定[S].
    [10]
    JTG D30—2015 公路路基设计规范[S].
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (210) PDF downloads(41) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return