Volume 35 Issue 6
Dec.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Shen Zhen, Qu Pengfei, Meng Kejing, Zhao Zhanyu. Correlation Between Pressuremeter Test and Standard Penetration Test on Sand Deformation Modulus[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2021, 35(6): 416-419. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2021.06.013
Citation: Shen Zhen, Qu Pengfei, Meng Kejing, Zhao Zhanyu. Correlation Between Pressuremeter Test and Standard Penetration Test on Sand Deformation Modulus[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2021, 35(6): 416-419. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2021.06.013

Correlation Between Pressuremeter Test and Standard Penetration Test on Sand Deformation Modulus

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2021.06.013
  • Received Date: 2021-01-15
  • Publish Date: 2021-12-10
  • To determine the deformation modulus of sand conveniently and accurately, based on the special geological survey of DN2200 Water Pipeline Reinforcement in Shuiyuanjiuchang, the blow count of standard penetration test and deformation modulus of pressuremeter test were statistically compared and analyzed, and the function relation between standard penetration blow count and deformation modulus was established. Considering the influence of different particle sizes of sand, fine sand and medium coarse sand were statistically analyzed respectively, and the function relationships were established. The results show that there is a high positive correlation between the blow count and deformation modulus of fine sand. Through the relationship, the deformation modulus index parameters of sandy soil can be conveniently calculated by using the standard penetration test, so as to meet the practical needs of engineering.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    DBJ 15—60—2008 建筑地基基础检测规范广东省标[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2008.
    [2]
    GB 50021—2001  岩土工程勘察规范(2009年版)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
    [3]
    化建新, 郑建国. 工程地质手册(第五版)[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2018.
    [4]
    陈希哲. 土力学地基基础(第四版)[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社.
    [5]
    范子中,王林志,胡 昊,等. 地基土变形模量估算新方法[J]. 湖南交通科技,2016,42(1):20.
    [6]
    肖先波. 黏性土旁压试验与标准贯入试验土体参数相关性分析[J]. 施工技术,2017,46(17):131.
    [7]
    陈法波,李志云,杨光华,等. 福建平潭风化花岗岩原位测试及岩土参数取值研究[J]. 水利水电技术,2020,51(7):147-153.
    [8]
    于元峰,张喜发,李 芳. 沙漠砂变形模量和地基承载力试验研究[J]. 岩土工程界,2006,9(6):30.
    [9]
    汪 浩,白文胜,曾祥勇. 基于旁压试验的贵阳红黏土力学性质分析[J]. 中国水运(下半月),2021,21(3):118-120,123.
    [10]
    唐 竞,赵云刚,许德鲜,等. 不同埋深粉细砂层旁压承载特性试验研究[J]. 粉煤灰综合利用,2020,34(6):41-44,73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8249.2020.06.009
    [11]
    彭柏兴,王星华. 软岩旁压试验与单轴抗压试验对比研究[J]. 岩土力学,2006,(3):451-454. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2006.03.022
    [12]
    赵善锐. 旁压试验及其工程应用[M]. 成都: 西南交通大学出版社, 1987.
    [13]
    李 昶,吴春勇,施晓文,等. 吉阳核电厂古近系砂质软岩地基旁压试验研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2015,23(1):740-744.
    [14]
    袁 峰,周水栋. 南京河西砂性土地基承载力旁压试验研究[J]. 山西建筑,2021,47(7):65-68.
    [15]
    王吉利,陈 盼,刘金龙. 谈预钻式旁压试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(S1):2911-2919.
    [16]
    TB 10018—2003 铁路工程地质原位测试规程(条文说明)[S].
    [17]
    王晓峰,王树怀. 砂土主要物理力学指标关系分析[J]. 中国科技信息,2017,(19):61-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8972.2017.19.021
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (162) PDF downloads(61) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return