Volume 36 Issue 5
Oct.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Bai Lihui, Zhu Cong, Huang Tianyuan, Yang Xinyuan, Tu Jiewen. Load Bearing Characteristics of Prefabricated Ecological Retaining Wall[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2022, 36(5): 345-352. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.05.001
Citation: Bai Lihui, Zhu Cong, Huang Tianyuan, Yang Xinyuan, Tu Jiewen. Load Bearing Characteristics of Prefabricated Ecological Retaining Wall[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2022, 36(5): 345-352. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.05.001

Load Bearing Characteristics of Prefabricated Ecological Retaining Wall

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.05.001
  • Received Date: 2021-06-23
    Available Online: 2022-10-08
  • Publish Date: 2022-10-08
  • Aiming at the disadvantages of traditional column slab wall, such as poor drainage performance, poor greening ability and low degree of prefabrication, the column of column slab wall is segmented and hollowed out, and the components are connected by bolts. By improving the retaining plate, a shutter shaped retaining plate is obtained. In order to determine its applicability and safety, the full scale destructive test is carried out firstly, and then the three-dimensional numerical simulation of this kind of retaining wall is carried out by using ABAQUS finite element software. The following conclusions are obtained: when the load reaches 202.5 kN, the moment at the bottom of the column, that is, when the bending moment reaches 337.50 kN·m, it reaches the limit state of normal use; when the load reaches 335 kN, take the moment at the bottom of the column, that is, when the bending moment reaches 558.33 kN·m, it reaches the limit state. This kind of retaining wall is different when it is used for the shoulder wall and the embankment wall, which shows that when it is used for the embankment wall, it is an open bulging "U" curve, while when it is used for the shoulder wall, it is a closed bulging "U" curve. With the increase of vehicle load distance, the force reduction rate of retaining wall structure first increases and then decreases.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    蒋梅东. 装配式挡土墙结构设计与试验研究[D]. 湘潭: 湖南科技大学, 2017.
    [2]
    刘 泽,何 矾,黄天棋,等. 装配悬臂式挡土墙节点承载特性试验研究[J]. 公路交通科技,2020,37(9):25-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2020.09.004
    [3]
    韩晓云. 路堤边坡绿化装配式挡土墙的稳定性分析[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2019.
    [4]
    屈俊童,段自侠,雷 真,等. 土拱效应下的挂板式斜插桩板墙模型试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2020,16(2):420-430.
    [5]
    中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司. 公路挡土墙设计与施工技术细则[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2008.
    [6]
    聂建国,王宇航. ABAQUS中混凝土本构模型用于模拟结构静力行为的比较研究[J]. 工程力学,2013,30(4):59-67,82.
    [7]
    LUBLINER J,OLIVER J,OLLER S,et al. A plastic-damage model for concrete[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures,1989,25(3):299-326. doi: 10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4
    [8]
    LEE J,FENVES G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division-ASCE,1998,124(8):892-900. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)
    [9]
    BELARBI A,HSU T T C. Constitutive laws of softened concrete in biaxial tension-compression[J]. ACI Structural Journal,1995,92(5):562-573.
    [10]
    MOHAMAD M,LEE J Y,HSU T T C. Cyclic stress-strain curves of concrete and steel bars in membrane elements[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2021,127(12):1402-1411.
    [11]
    阮宜东. 宕渣土填筑性能的试验研究与仿真优化设计[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2012.
    [12]
    詹炳根,叶晓华,韩 丁,等. 宕渣土桥背回填冲击累积变形研究[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2013,(11):1347-1351.
    [13]
    王力威,茅一帆,孙康乐. 灰土比和龄期对灰土抗剪性能影响的试验研究[J]. 科技通报,2016,32(11):89-93,114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7119.2016.11.018
    [14]
    王 珊. 边坡工程设计施工新技术与质量检测验收实务全书[M]. 北京: 北京北影出版社, 2012.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(11)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (94) PDF downloads(18) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return