Volume 38 Issue 2
Apr.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Yuan Senlin. Analysis of Construction Disturbance Measurement of Three Lane Rectangular Pipe Jacking Tunnel with Small Clear Distance[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2024, 38(2): 175-180. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.02.009
Citation: Yuan Senlin. Analysis of Construction Disturbance Measurement of Three Lane Rectangular Pipe Jacking Tunnel with Small Clear Distance[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2024, 38(2): 175-180. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.02.009

Analysis of Construction Disturbance Measurement of Three Lane Rectangular Pipe Jacking Tunnel with Small Clear Distance

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.02.009
  • Received Date: 2023-02-20
  • Accepted Date: 2023-12-25
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-06-03
  • Publish Date: 2024-04-11
  • The on-site measurement and analysis were conducted on the internal force, soil pressure, jacking force, vertical attitude, and surface settlement caused by the construction of a 1.2 m ultra-small clear distance three-lane pipe-jacking rectangular tunnel under the Jiaxing Ring Road, which passes through Nanhu Avenue. During the later implementation of tunnel excavation, the internal force of the double line pipe-jacking of rectangular tunnel fluctuated due to posture adjustment and the effect of lubricating mud. As the tunnel construction approaches, the internal force of the previous pipe weakens, strengthens, and then recovers, resulting in a maximum reinforcement stress increase of about 30%; Compared with conventional single-line rectangular pipe jacking, the surface settlement caused by construction exhibits a relatively flat peck settlement curve, and the maximum settlement was concentrated on the originating well side, showing a certain drag effect as the jacking distance increases; The main factor of the settlement difference between the north and south lines was the vertical attitude control of tunneling, and the jacking force did not show a large difference due to the small clearance.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    吴圣贤. 某地铁过街通道大断面矩形顶管工程设计[J]. 现代隧道技术,2012,49(3):119-124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2012.03.018
    [2]
    贾连辉. 矩形顶管在城市地下空间开发中的应用及前景[J]. 隧道建设,2016,36(10):1269-1276. doi: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2016.10.017
    [3]
    周智辉. 轨道交通隧道大断面矩形顶管施工技术[J]. 四川建材,2017,43(11):156-157.
    [4]
    DG/TJ 08—2268—2019 顶管工程设计标准[S].
    [5]
    庄欠伟. 矩形隧道掘进技术的发展历程和现状[J]. 筑路机械与施工机械化,2018,(1):34-37.
    [6]
    李明宇,王 松,张维熙,等. 大断面矩形顶管隧道施工引起的地面沉降分析[J]. 铁道建筑,2019,59(5):81-84.
    [7]
    邓长茂,彭基敏,沈国红. 软土地区矩形顶管施工地表变形控制措施探讨[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2016,12(4):1002-1007.
    [8]
    刘永辉,李明宇,吕 聪,等. 浅覆土矩形顶管施工中地面沉降变化规律及分布特征研究[J]. 建筑技术,2020,51(2):226-229. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4726.2020.02.028
    [9]
    吴 勇,徐日庆,段景川,等. 浅覆土大断面小间距矩形顶管施工的环境效应[J]. 现代隧道技术,2017,54(5):78-85.
    [10]
    荣 亮,杨红军. 郑州市下穿中州大道超大断面矩形顶管隧道施工沉降控制技术[J]. 隧道建设,2015,35(12):1338-1344. doi: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2015.12.016
    [11]
    朱 剑,李振勇,张 泷. 复杂环境下大断面矩形顶管法施工过程地表沉降规律及控制措施研究[J]. 岩土工程技术,2017,31(1):49-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2017.01.012
    [12]
    王光辉,杨朝帅. 超小净距矩形顶管隧道群施工力学研究[J]. 低温建筑技术,2017,39(8):103-108.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(19)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (44) PDF downloads(10) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return