Volume 38 Issue 3
Jun.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Du Kun, Lyu Feihua, Ji Xinyu, Han Jiajia, Jiang Donglai. Numerical Simulation on Sealing Performance of Pipe Jacking Hole Sealing Device[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2024, 38(3): 309-316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.03.008
Citation: Du Kun, Lyu Feihua, Ji Xinyu, Han Jiajia, Jiang Donglai. Numerical Simulation on Sealing Performance of Pipe Jacking Hole Sealing Device[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2024, 38(3): 309-316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.03.008

Numerical Simulation on Sealing Performance of Pipe Jacking Hole Sealing Device

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.03.008
  • Received Date: 2023-07-12
  • Publish Date: 2024-06-12
  • A simplified two-dimensional plane model was established by using ABAQUS software based on the curtain rubber plate + folding plate combined waterproof device commonly used in the pipe jacking construction site. By changing the parameters of the rubber plate, folding plate, and material hardness, the sealing law of the waterproof device was studied, and the sealing evaluation standard and optimal combination form were proposed. The research shows that the sealing device with the combination of curtain rubber plate and folding plate can effectively avoid the phenomenon of water and sand leakage at the hole. However, if the rubber plate is too long or the folding plate is too short, the effective contact stress of the end will be reduced. Too short a rubber plate or too long a folding plate will cause stress concentration at the end of the rubber plate, and the effective contact length is small. At the same time, too high hardness will also cause stress concentration at the end position and reduce the effective contact length. In these cases, the sealing performance will decrease.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    钱七虎, 李朝甫, 傅德明. 隧道掘进机在中国地下工程中应用现状及前景展望[J]. 地下空间,2002, 22(1):1-11,93.
    [2]
    洪开荣, 冯欢欢. 近2年我国隧道及地下工程发展与思考(2019—2020年)[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2021,41(8):1259-1280.
    [3]
    房营光, 莫海鸿, 张传英. 顶管施工扰动区土体变形的理论与实测分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2003, 22(4):601-605.
    [4]
    魏 纲, 徐日庆, 屠 玮. 顶管施工引起的土体扰动理论分析及试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004(3):476-482.
    [5]
    YUAN Y, XU Y S, ARULRAJAH A. Sustainable measures for mitigation of flooding hazards: A case study in Shanghai, China[J]. Water,2017,9(5):310. doi: 10.3390/w9050310
    [6]
    魏新江, 魏 纲. 水平平行顶管引起的地面沉降计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学,2006,(7):1129-1132.

    魏新江, 魏 纲. 水平平行顶管引起的地面沉降计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学,2006,(7): 1129-1132.
    [7]
    李 海, 朱长松. 天津地铁6号线西青道站—南运河站区间盾构到达接收措施失效处理实例[J]. 隧道建设,2016,36(12):1512-1516.
    [8]
    潘建立, 黄 欣, 宫大辉, 等.一种顶管施工中管节密封性测试试验方法:CN201510451823.0[P].
    [9]
    王翔宇. 适用于高水压的顶管进出洞止水装置研究[C]//中国地质学会非开挖技术专业委员会. 2015年非开挖技术会议论文集. 《非开挖技术》杂志社, 2015.
    [10]
    徐玉夏. 顶管中继间密封止水装置的改进[J]. 建筑施工,2013,35(7):652-653.
    [11]
    孙 昕, 武 威, 焦亚基, 等. 盾构隧道管片接缝气密性模拟方法与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2021,43(2):375-382.
    [12]
    左 亮, 肖绯雄. 橡胶Mooney-Rivlin模型材料系数的一种确定方法[J]. 机械制造,2008,527(7):38-40.
    [13]
    楚 健, 陈凯华, 查昞豪, 等. 氯离子作用下橡胶密封垫防水性能数值模拟[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2019,15(S1):144-149.
    [14]
    李 拼, 谢宏明, 何 川, 等. 基于有效接触应力的大张开量盾构隧道密封垫防水性能分析[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2019,39(12):1993-1999.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(11)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (71) PDF downloads(17) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return