留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

探地雷达管线探测响应特征研究

石宗源 索奎 裴鸿 马岩 李阳阳 陈世仲 金路 张卓

石宗源, 索奎, 裴鸿, 马岩, 李阳阳, 陈世仲, 金路, 张卓. 探地雷达管线探测响应特征研究[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2026, 40(4): 542-551. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2025-0039
引用本文: 石宗源, 索奎, 裴鸿, 马岩, 李阳阳, 陈世仲, 金路, 张卓. 探地雷达管线探测响应特征研究[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2026, 40(4): 542-551. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2025-0039
SHI Zongyuan, SUO Kui, PEI Hong, MA Yan, LI Yangyang, CHEN Shizhong, JIN Lu, ZHANG Zhuo. Response characteristics of ground penetrating radar (GPR) for pipeline detection[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2026, 40(4): 542-551. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2025-0039
Citation: SHI Zongyuan, SUO Kui, PEI Hong, MA Yan, LI Yangyang, CHEN Shizhong, JIN Lu, ZHANG Zhuo. Response characteristics of ground penetrating radar (GPR) for pipeline detection[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2026, 40(4): 542-551. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2025-0039

探地雷达管线探测响应特征研究

doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2025-0039
详细信息
    作者简介:

    石宗源,男,1996年生,硕士,助理工程师,主要从事工程物探方面工作。E-mail:862577245@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    张 卓,男,1981年生,大学本科,高级工程师,主要从事地球物理探测工作。E-mail:31790195@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: P631;TU990.3

Response characteristics of ground penetrating radar (GPR) for pipeline detection

  • 摘要: 探地雷达是广泛应用于市政管线探测的浅部探测技术。为了提高对雷达探测地下管线雷达图像特征的认识,细化不同工况下雷达探测识别效果,提高雷达资料的解释精度,从雷达探测原理、时域有限差分模拟和管道探测现场工况出发,基于正演模拟软件gprMax建立不同材质、不同形态、不同管径、不同埋深、不同充水程度和不均匀介质等不同要素的模型,总结正演模拟剖面的特征,分析形成相应响应特征的因素,梳理不同参数对探测效果的影响。模拟与实测效果对比表明,可通过正演分析为工程实测提供参考。

     

  • 图  1  探地雷达探测原理示意图

    Figure  1.  GPR detection principle schematic

    图  2  数值模拟270 MHz天线对DN500/DN800混凝土管反射波Ez随深度变化曲线

    注:括号内数据为深度和接收到反射波峰值能量。

    Figure  2.  Curves of reflected wave Ez varying with depth for 270 MHz antenna on DN500/DN800 concrete pipes by numerical simulation

    图  3  一维FDTD电磁场随时间递推过程

    Figure  3.  One-dimensional FDTD electromagnetic field recursive process over times

    图  4  不同材质管线正演模型

    Figure  4.  Forward modeling of pipelines with different materials

    图  5  不同材质管线正演剖面

    Figure  5.  Forward profiles of pipelines with different materials

    图  6  三种材质管线正上方反射波单道曲线

    Figure  6.  Single-trace reflection curves directly above pipelines of three materials

    图  7  不同形态管线正演模型

    Figure  7.  Forward modeling of pipelines with different shapes

    图  8  三种形态管线正演剖面

    Figure  8.  Forward profiles of pipelines with three shapes

    图  9  洞室内管线与管线脱空正演模型

    Figure  9.  Forward modeling of pipelines and pipeline voids inside the cavity

    图  10  洞室与管线脱空正演剖面

    Figure  10.  Forward-looking profile of cavity and pipeline air voids

    图  11  测线与管线斜交正演模型

    Figure  11.  Forward modeling of survey line obliquely intersecting with pipeline

    图  12  测线与管线斜交正演剖面

    Figure  12.  Forward profile of survey line obliquely intersecting with pipeline

    图  13  地埋管线时距关系示意图

    Figure  13.  Schematic diagram of time–distance relationship for buried pipelines

    图  14  射线理论下管线响应时距曲线形态

    Figure  14.  Morphology of time–distance curve of pipeline response under ray theory

    图  15  不同管径管线正演模型

    Figure  15.  Forward modeling of pipelines with different diameters

    图  16  不同管径管线正演剖面

    Figure  16.  Forward profiles of pipelines with different diameters

    图  17  不同埋深管线正演模型

    Figure  17.  Forward modeling of pipelines with different burial depths

    图  18  不同埋深管线正演剖面

    Figure  18.  Forward profiles of pipelines with different burial depths

    图  19  270 MHz天线实测1.2 m埋深、DN500混凝土管响应

    Figure  19.  Measured response of DN500 concrete pipe at 1.2 m burial depth using 270 MHz antenna

    图  20  管线中水不同填充程度正演模型

    Figure  20.  Forward modeling of pipelines with different water filling degrees

    图  21  管线中水不同填充程度正演剖面

    Figure  21.  Forward profiles of pipelines with different water filling degrees

    图  22  管道渗漏正演模型

    Figure  22.  Forward modeling of pipeline leakage

    图  23  管道渗漏正演剖面

    Figure  23.  Forward profiles of pipeline leakage

    图  24  典型雨污水管线存在渗漏不密实实测剖面

    Figure  24.  Typical profile of rainwater and sewage pipelines with leakage and compaction defects

    图  25  不均匀土体中管道正演模型

    Figure  25.  Forward modeling of pipeline in heterogeneous soil

    图  26  不均匀土体中管道正演剖面

    Figure  26.  Forward profile of pipeline in heterogeneous soil

    表  1  正演模拟物性参数表

    Table  1.   Physical property parameters for forward modeling

    介质 相对介电常数 电导率/(S·m−1
    81 0.01
    土体 10 0.003
    混凝土 7.5 0.001
    PVC 3 0
    沥青 6 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 曹宏宇. 基于电磁法的地下金属管线探测系统研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学, 2023. (CAO H Y. Research on underground metal pipeline detection system based on electromagnetic method[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2023, doi: 10.27107/d.cnki.ghbku.2022.000207.(in Chinese)

    CAO H Y. Research on underground metal pipeline detection system based on electromagnetic method[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2023, doi: 10.27107/d.cnki.ghbku.2022.000207.(in Chinese)
    [2] YEE K S. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 1966, 14(3): 302-307.
    [3] GIANNOPOULOS A. Modelling ground penetrating radar by GprMax[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2005, 19(10): 755-762.
    [4] 曾昭发, 霍祉君, 李文奔, 等. 任意各向异性介质三维有限元航空电磁响应模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 433-444. (ZENG Z F, HUO Z J, LI W B, et al. 3D vector finite-element airborne electromagnetic modelling in an arbitrary anisotropic medium[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 433-444, (in Chinese) doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170243

    ZENG Z F, HUO Z J, LI W B, et al. 3D vector finite-element airborne electromagnetic modelling in an arbitrary anisotropic medium[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 433-444, doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170243
    [5] 刘四新, 佐藤源之. 井中雷达的数值模拟[C]//中国地球物理学会年刊2002——中国地球物理学会第十八届年会论文集. 北海: 中国地球物理学会, 2002: 219. (LIU S X, SATO G. Numerical simulation of borehole radar[C]//Annual Report of the Chinese Geophysical Society 2002-Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Chinese Geophysical Society. Beihai: Chinese Geophysical Society, 2002: 219. (in Chinese)

    LIU S X, SATO G. Numerical simulation of borehole radar[C]//Annual Report of the Chinese Geophysical Society 2002-Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Chinese Geophysical Society. Beihai: Chinese Geophysical Society, 2002: 219. (in Chinese)
    [6] 刘四新, 宋梓豪, 程建远, 等. 利用钻孔雷达探测煤矿井下顶底板界面的数值模拟研究[J]. 世界地质, 2021, 40(3): 711-720. (LIU S X, SONG Z H, CHENG J Y, et al. Numerical simulation research on detecting underground coal mine roof and floor using borehole radar[J]. Global Geology, 2021, 40(3): 711-720, (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2021.03.024

    LIU S X, SONG Z H, CHENG J Y, et al. Numerical simulation research on detecting underground coal mine roof and floor using borehole radar[J]. Global Geology, 2021, 40(3): 711-720, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2021.03.024
    [7] 梁小强, 杨道学, 张可能, 等. FDTD数值模拟在GPR管线探测中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(4): 1803-1807. (LIANG X Q, YANG D X, ZHANG K N, et al. Application of FDTD numerical simulation of Ground Penetrating Radar inpipeline detection[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32(4): 1803-1807. (in Chinese)

    LIANG X Q, YANG D X, ZHANG K N, et al. Application of FDTD numerical simulation of Ground Penetrating Radar inpipeline detection[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32(4): 1803-1807. (in Chinese)
    [8] 赵 欣, 王希良, 刘珍岩, 等. 复杂条件下的地下管线探测模拟[J]. 物探与化探, 2014, 38(6): 1307-1312. (ZHAO X, WANG X L, LIU Z Y, et al. Simulation of underground pipelines under complicated condition[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 38(6): 1307-1312. (in Chinese)

    ZHAO X, WANG X L, LIU Z Y, et al. Simulation of underground pipelines under complicated condition[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 38(6): 1307-1312. (in Chinese)
    [9] 罗小龙. 基于GPRMAX的地下管线探地雷达图像正演模拟[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2018. (LUO X L. Forward modeling of ground penetrating radar image based on GPRMAX[D]. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2018. (in Chinese)

    LUO X L. Forward modeling of ground penetrating radar image based on GPRMAX[D]. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2018. (in Chinese)
    [10] 秦 镇. 基于探地雷达的城市地下非金属管线探测识别研究[D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2019. (QIN Z. Research on detection and recognition of urban underground nonmetallic pipelines based on GPR[D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science & Technology, 2019. (in Chinese)

    QIN Z. Research on detection and recognition of urban underground nonmetallic pipelines based on GPR[D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science & Technology, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [11] SHIHAB S, AL-NUAIMY W, ERIKSEN A. Radius estimation for subsurface cylindrical objects detected by ground penetrating radar[C]//Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004. Delft: IEEE, 2004: 319-322.
    [12] 孙 伟. 地下管线探测数据处理及可视化技术研究[D]. 郑州: 网络空间部队信息工程大学, 2012. (SUN W. Research on detection data processing and visualization of underground pipeline[D]. Zhengzhou: Information Engineering University of Cyberspace Forces, 2012. (in Chinese)

    SUN W. Research on detection data processing and visualization of underground pipeline[D]. Zhengzhou: Information Engineering University of Cyberspace Forces, 2012. (in Chinese)
    [13] 李靖翔, 赵 明, 赖 皓, 等. 地下电缆的探地雷达图像特征与识别技术[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(6): 1482-1489. (LI J X, ZHAO M, LAI H, et al. Imaging detection and recognition technology of underground cable based on ground penetrating radar[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(6): 1482-1489, (in Chinese) doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2020.1339

    LI J X, ZHAO M, LAI H, et al. Imaging detection and recognition technology of underground cable based on ground penetrating radar[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(6): 1482-1489, doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2020.1339
    [14] 黄哲骢. 基于探地雷达的管道漏损检测研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2019. (HUANG Z C. Study on leak detection of pipeline based on ground-penetrating radar[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2019. (in Chinese)

    HUANG Z C. Study on leak detection of pipeline based on ground-penetrating radar[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [15] 杨 军, 李 婷, 袁忠明, 等. 管线模型的探地雷达物理模拟实验[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2023, 38(2): 912-927. (YANG J, LI T, YUAN Z M, et al. Ground penetrating radar physical simulation experiment of pipeline model[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2023, 38(2): 912-927. (in Chinese)

    YANG J, LI T, YUAN Z M, et al. Ground penetrating radar physical simulation experiment of pipeline model[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2023, 38(2): 912-927. (in Chinese)
    [16] 许献磊, 杨 峰, 夏云海, 等. 矿井超深探测地质雷达天线的开发及应用[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2016, 44(4): 124-129. (XU X L, YANG F, XIA Y H, et al. Development and application of mine geological radar antenna for mine ultra-deep detection[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2016, 44(4): 124-129, (in Chinese) doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2016.04.025

    XU X L, YANG F, XIA Y H, et al. Development and application of mine geological radar antenna for mine ultra-deep detection[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2016, 44(4): 124-129, doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2016.04.025
    [17] 石宗源. 地下非金属管线雷达探测研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2022. (SHI Z Y. Research on GPR detection of underground nonmetallic pipelines[D]. Zhengzhou: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, 2022. (in Chinese)

    SHI Z Y. Research on GPR detection of underground nonmetallic pipelines[D]. Zhengzhou: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, 2022. (in Chinese)
    [18] SARKAR D. FDTD analysis of guided electromagnetic wave interaction with time-modulated dielectric medium[M]. Singapore: Springer, 2022
    [19] 黎 霞, 高燕希, 宁黎磊, 等. 隧道衬砌介电常数试验与理论分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2008, 21(5): 70-74. (LI X, GAO Y X, NING L L, et al. Experimental and theoretical analysis on permittivity of tunnel lining[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2008, 21(5): 70-74, (in Chinese) doi: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2008.05.013

    LI X, GAO Y X, NING L L, et al. Experimental and theoretical analysis on permittivity of tunnel lining[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2008, 21(5): 70-74, doi: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2008.05.013
    [20] 王天琪, 李 静, 白利舸, 等. 基于速度分析的探地雷达阻抗介电常数反演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 561-570. (WANG T Q, LI J, BAI L G, et al. GPR impedance inversion of permittivity based on velocity analysis[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(2): 561-570, (in Chinese) doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200038

    WANG T Q, LI J, BAI L G, et al. GPR impedance inversion of permittivity based on velocity analysis[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(2): 561-570, doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200038
    [21] 王 伟. 基于雷达技术的大埋深管线探测应用研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2022, 12(9): 1221-1234. (WANG W. Study on the application of radar technology in the detection of deep buried pipelines[J]. Advances in Geosciences, 2022, 12(9): 1221-1234, (in Chinese) doi: 10.12677/AG.2022.129118

    WANG W. Study on the application of radar technology in the detection of deep buried pipelines[J]. Advances in Geosciences, 2022, 12(9): 1221-1234, doi: 10.12677/AG.2022.129118
    [22] 朱盛延, 李飞飞, 陈春阳, 等. 基于gprMax探地雷达管线探测径深比正演研究[J]. 中华建设, 2020(27): 151-153. (ZHU S Y, LI F F, CHEN C Y, et al. Forward modeling research on the ratio relationship between pipe diameter and burial depth in ground penetrating radar pipeline detection based on gprMax[J]. China Construction, 2020(27): 151-153. (in Chinese)

    ZHU S Y, LI F F, CHEN C Y, et al. Forward modeling research on the ratio relationship between pipe diameter and burial depth in ground penetrating radar pipeline detection based on gprMax[J]. China Construction, 2020(27): 151-153. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(26) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  34
  • HTML全文浏览量:  10
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-01-21
  • 修回日期:  2025-06-14
  • 录用日期:  2025-06-26
  • 刊出日期:  2026-08-08

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回