留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于掌子面图像识别的隧道围岩分级与应用

徐敏 余望 傅鹤林 曹桂乾 李俊

徐敏, 余望, 傅鹤林, 曹桂乾, 李俊. 基于掌子面图像识别的隧道围岩分级与应用[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2026, 40(2): 175-184. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2025-0053
引用本文: 徐敏, 余望, 傅鹤林, 曹桂乾, 李俊. 基于掌子面图像识别的隧道围岩分级与应用[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2026, 40(2): 175-184. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2025-0053
XU Min, YU Wang, FU Helin, CAO Guiqian, LI Jun. Tunnel surrounding rock classification and application based on face image recognition[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2026, 40(2): 175-184. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2025-0053
Citation: XU Min, YU Wang, FU Helin, CAO Guiqian, LI Jun. Tunnel surrounding rock classification and application based on face image recognition[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2026, 40(2): 175-184. doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2025-0053

基于掌子面图像识别的隧道围岩分级与应用

doi: 10.20265/j.cnki.issn.1007-2993.2025-0053
基金项目: 湖南省教育厅重点课题(23A0014)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    徐 敏,男,1988年生,大学本科,高级工程师,主要从事市政和建筑工程管理工作。E-mail:512306774@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    傅鹤林,男,1965年生,博士,二级教授,主要从事隧道工程灾害防治研究。E-mail:fu.h.l@csu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: U45

Tunnel surrounding rock classification and application based on face image recognition

  • 摘要: 隧道开挖过程中围岩的稳定性极其重要,支护设计依赖于隧道围岩质量的精准分级。为实现隧道施工期间的围岩快速精准分级,基于YOLOv8深度学习算法和数字图像处理技术,以隧道掌子面为研究对象,结合修正BQ法提出了一种隧道围岩智能化快速分级方法。结果表明,YOLOv8深度学习模型能够准确识别并定位隧道掌子面照片上的裂隙位置,结合图像处理技术可有效提取掌子面裂隙信息,从而有效评价隧道掌子面完整程度,实现对隧道围岩的快速分级。该方法在岳阳来米坡隧道实际应用表明,与实际围岩等级相比,采用该方法的围岩等级预测准确率达90%,能够满足隧道施工期间围岩快速分级需求。研究成果为隧道围岩等级的动态划分及指导隧道开挖、支护提供了参考。

     

  • 图  1  YOLOv8算法检测结果

    Figure  1.  Detection results of YOLOv8 algorithm

    图  2  YOLOv8的PR曲线

    Figure  2.  PR curve of YOLOv8

    图  3  掌子面完整程度评价流程

    Figure  3.  Evaluation process of tunnel face integrity

    图  4  掌子面照片处理过程

    Figure  4.  Processing procedure of tunnel face photographs

    图  5  隧道掌子面回弹测试区及测点布置

    Figure  5.  Rebound test zones and measuring point arrangement on tunnel face

    图  6  围岩智能分级流程

    Figure  6.  Intelligent classification workflow for surrounding rock

    图  7  分级情况对比图

    Figure  7.  Comparison diagram of classification results

    表  1  BQ法围岩分级表[24]

    Table  1.   Rock mass classification table using BQ method[24]

    岩体质量级别岩体基本质量的定性特征岩体质量指标
    坚硬岩,岩体完整>550
    坚硬岩,岩体较完整;较坚硬岩,岩体完整550~451
    坚硬岩,岩体较破碎;较坚硬岩,岩体较完整;较软岩,岩体完整450~351
    坚硬岩,岩体破碎;较坚硬岩,岩体较破碎—破碎;较软岩,岩体较完整—较破碎;软岩,岩体完整—较完整350~251
    较软岩,岩体破碎;软岩,岩体较破碎—破碎;全部极软岩及极破碎岩≤250
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  地下水影响修正系数K1[24]

    Table  2.   Correction coefficient K1 for groundwater influence[24]

    地下水状态BQ值
    >550550~451450~351350~251≤250
    潮湿或点滴状出水,p≤0.1或Q≤25000~0.10.2~0.30.4~0.6
    淋雨状或线流状出水,0.1≤p≤0.5或25≤Q≤1250~0.10.1~0.20.2~0.30.4~0.60.7~0.9
    涌流状出水,p>0.5或Q>1250.1~0.20.2~0.30.4~0.60.7~0.91.0
    注:p为地下工程围岩裂隙水压,MPa;Q为每10 m洞长出水量,L/min·(10 m)。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  软弱结构面产状影响修正系数K2[24]

    Table  3.   Correction coefficient K2 for weak structural plane occurrence[24]

    结构面产状及其洞轴线的组合关系 结构面走向与洞轴线夹角<30°,
    结构面倾角30°~75°
    结构面走向与洞轴线夹角>60°,
    结构面倾角>75°
    其他组合关系
    K2 0.4~0.6 0~0.2 0.2~0.4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  初始地应力状态修正系数K3[24]

    Table  4.   Correction coefficient K3 for initial ground stress state[24]

    初始应力状态 BQ值
    >550 550~451 450~351 350~251 ≤250
    极高应力 Rcmax<4 1.0 1.0 1.0~1.5 1.0~1.5 1.0
    高应力 Rcmax=4~7 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5~1.0 0.5~1.0
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  裂隙比Ks划分表[1]

    Table  5.   Classification table for fracture ratio Ks[1]

    裂隙比 >0.1 0.08~0.1 0.04~0.08 0.01~0.04 <0.01
    节理裂隙发育程度 很发育 发育 一般发育 较不发育 不发育
    掌子面完整程度 极破碎 破碎 较破碎 较完整 完整
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  实验超参数设置

    Table  6.   Experimental hyperparameter settings

    参数名称设置值
    Image-size(图像尺寸)640×640×3
    epochs(迭代次数)300
    Batch size(批次大小)4
    optimizer(优化器)SGD
    Learing rate(学习率)0.01
    Momentum(动量)0.937
    Weight decay(权重衰减)0.0005
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  裂隙比Ks和完整性系数Kv对应关系表

    Table  7.   Corresponding relationship between fracture ratio Ks and integrity coefficient Kv

    掌子面完整程度 极破碎 破碎 破碎 较完整 完整
    裂隙比Ks >0.1 0.08~0.1 0.04~0.08 0.01~0.04 <0.01
    完整性系数Kv <0.15 0.15~0.35 0.35~0.55 0.55~0.75 >0.75
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  8  岩层分布情况

    Table  8.   Distribution of rock strata

    序号 岩土层名称 岩性特征 层厚/m
    1 素填土 黄色、紫红色等,结构松散,主要由黏性土夹板岩碎石组成,未完成自重固结 3~4.5
    2 粉质黏土 褐黄、褐红色,硬塑状,含少量碎石 0.5~3.5
    3 强风化炭质硅质板岩 灰褐、褐黄色,大部分矿物已风化变质,岩质较软,岩体极破碎,
    岩芯多呈碎片、碎块状,局部风不均匀,残留少量硅质岩块
    32~45
    4 中等风化炭质硅质板岩 深灰、灰黑色,岩质较硬—坚硬,岩体破碎,岩芯呈碎块状、块状、少量呈短柱状 基岩
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  9  [BQ]的预测值与实测值对比表

    Table  9.   Comparison between predicted and measured [BQ] values

    编号隧道桩号岩石坚硬程度Rc掌子面完整性系数Kv地下水K1岩体产状K2初始地应力K3[BQ]值
    预测值实测值
    1K1+74020.60.30.70.20146.8145
    2K1+75660.60.70.30.20406.8418
    3K1+76461.10.50.30.20.5370.8380
    4K1+77047.30.50.70.20276.9270
    5K1+77860.70.480.70.20312.1315
    6K1+78540.50.50.20.20306.5305
    7K1+79160.40.750.30.20418.7418
    8K1+79921.30.30.80.20138.9135
    9K1+80360.20.660.30.20.5345.6380
    10K1+81060.10.510.70.20317.8315
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 黄音昊. 隧道围岩分级特征参数的图像智能识别及应用[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2021. (HUANG Y H. Image recognition of Feature parameters of surrounding rock classification in tunnels and its application[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)

    HUANG Y H. Image recognition of Feature parameters of surrounding rock classification in tunnels and its application[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)
    [2] TERZAGHI K. Rock defects and loads on tunnel supports[M]//PROCTOR R V, WHITE T L. Rock Tunneling with Steel Supports. Youngstown: Commercial Shearing and Stamping Company, 1946.
    [3] WICKHAM G E, TIEDEMANN H R, SKINNER E H. Support determination based on geologic predictions[C]//North American Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference. Chicago: Society of Mining Engineers of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, 1972: 43-64.
    [4] BIENIAWSKI Z T. Engineering rock mass classifications: a complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining, civil, and petroleum engineering[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.
    [5] BARTON N, LIEN R, LUNDE J. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1974, 6(4): 189-236. doi: 10.1007/BF01239496
    [6] DEERE D U, HENDRON A J, PATTON F D, et al. Design of surface and near-surface construction in rock[C]//The 8th U. S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). Minneapolis, 1966.
    [7] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 工程岩体分级标准: GB/T 50218—2014[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2015. (Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for engineering classification of rock mass: GB/T 50218—2014[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2015. (in Chinese)

    Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for engineering classification of rock mass: GB/T 50218—2014[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2015. (in Chinese)
    [8] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 水力发电工程地质勘察规范: GB 50287—2016[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2017. (Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Code for hydropower engineering geological investigation: GB 50287—2016[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2017. (in Chinese)

    Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Code for hydropower engineering geological investigation: GB 50287—2016[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2017. (in Chinese)
    [9] TU W F, LI L P, LI S S, et al. Research on the application of dynamic weighting on the rock mass quality rating[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2019, 12(3): 87. doi: 10.1007/s12517-019-4264-9
    [10] 姜 鹏, 章剑青, 朱征平. 公路隧道围岩分级岩体基本质量指标修正方法探讨[J]. 公路, 2020, 65(1): 332-335. (JIANG P, ZHANG J Q, ZHU Z P. Discussion on the correction method of basic quality indicators for graded rock mass of highway tunnel surrounding rock[J]. Highway, 2020, 65(1): 332-335. (in Chinese)

    JIANG P, ZHANG J Q, ZHU Z P. Discussion on the correction method of basic quality indicators for graded rock mass of highway tunnel surrounding rock[J]. Highway, 2020, 65(1): 332-335. (in Chinese)
    [11] 童建军, 桂登斌, 王明年, 等. 岩溶隧道围岩级别修正方法研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(S1): 99-107. (TONG J J, GUI D B, WANG M N, et al. Modifying methods for surrounding rock grade of karst tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(S1): 99-107. (in Chinese)

    TONG J J, GUI D B, WANG M N, et al. Modifying methods for surrounding rock grade of karst tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(S1): 99-107. (in Chinese)
    [12] 吴 敏, 黄 智, 刘大刚. 基于BQ值修正的岩溶隧道围岩分级方法研究与应用[J]. 高速铁路技术, 2020, 11(6): 1-5. (WU M, HUANG Z, LIU D G. Research and application of surrounding rock classification method of karst tunnel based on BQ value correction[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2020, 11(6): 1-5. (in Chinese)

    WU M, HUANG Z, LIU D G. Research and application of surrounding rock classification method of karst tunnel based on BQ value correction[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2020, 11(6): 1-5. (in Chinese)
    [13] 李曙光, 申艳军, 谢江胜, 等. 高原山岭隧道围岩分级方法适宜性评价及初步优化思路[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2023(8): 33-35,58. (LI S G, SHEN Y J, XIE J S, et al. Suitability evaluation and preliminary optimization of surrounding rock classification method for Plateau Mountain Tunnel[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2023(8): 33-35,58. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2023.08.008

    LI S G, SHEN Y J, XIE J S, et al. Suitability evaluation and preliminary optimization of surrounding rock classification method for Plateau Mountain Tunnel[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2023(8): 33-35,58. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2023.08.008
    [14] 邹卫东. 抽水蓄能电站交通隧洞围岩分级方法研究[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2023(8): 53-58. (ZOU W D. Study on classification method of surrounding rock of traffic tunnel in pumped storage power station[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2023(8): 53-58. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2023.08.013

    ZOU W D. Study on classification method of surrounding rock of traffic tunnel in pumped storage power station[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2023(8): 53-58. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4539.2023.08.013
    [15] 樊纯坛, 梁庆国, 岳建平, 等. 层状岩体地下洞室施工阶段围岩精细化分级[J]. 中国公路学报, 2023, 36(4): 169-182. (FAN C T, LIANG Q G, YUE J P, et al. Study on fine classification of surrounding rock during construction stage of underground cavern with layered rock mass[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(4): 169-182. (in Chinese)

    FAN C T, LIANG Q G, YUE J P, et al. Study on fine classification of surrounding rock during construction stage of underground cavern with layered rock mass[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(4): 169-182. (in Chinese)
    [16] 郑颖人, 阿比尔的. 岩质隧道围岩稳定分析与分级研讨[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(1): 1-13. (ZHENG Y R, ABI E D. On Stability analysis and classification of surrounding rocks in rock tunnels[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2022, 59(1): 1-13. (in Chinese)

    ZHENG Y R, ABI E D. On Stability analysis and classification of surrounding rocks in rock tunnels[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2022, 59(1): 1-13. (in Chinese)
    [17] 唐中华, 宋金龙, 潘江波, 等. 基于近景摄影测量的隧道围岩质量快速评价方法研究[J]. 科技通报, 2022, 38(11): 71-77. (TANG Z H, SONG J L, PAN J B, et al. Study on rapid grading of surrounding rock in tunnel based on photogrammetry[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2022, 38(11): 71-77. (in Chinese)

    TANG Z H, SONG J L, PAN J B, et al. Study on rapid grading of surrounding rock in tunnel based on photogrammetry[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2022, 38(11): 71-77. (in Chinese)
    [18] 郭瑞东, 郝付军. 综合超前地质预报在围岩分级的应用研究[J]. 江苏建筑, 2022(3): 118-122. (GUO R D, HAO F J. Application study of comprehensive advance geological prediction in surrounding rock classification[J]. Jiangsu Construction, 2022(3): 118-122. (in Chinese)

    GUO R D, HAO F J. Application study of comprehensive advance geological prediction in surrounding rock classification[J]. Jiangsu Construction, 2022(3): 118-122. (in Chinese)
    [19] 王元清. 基于超前地质预报技术的隧道围岩分级方法研究[J]. 公路, 2021, 66(3): 398-401. (WANG Y Q. Research on tunnel surrounding rock classification method based on advanced geological prediction technology[J]. Highway, 2021, 66(3): 398-401. (in Chinese)

    WANG Y Q. Research on tunnel surrounding rock classification method based on advanced geological prediction technology[J]. Highway, 2021, 66(3): 398-401. (in Chinese)
    [20] 鲜晴羽, 仇文革, 王泓颖, 等. 基于卷积神经网络的隧道掌子面图像质量评价方法研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2020, 17(3): 563-572. (XIAN Q Y, QIU W G, WANG H Y, et al. Research on image quality assessment method of tunnel face based on convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 563-572. (in Chinese)

    XIAN Q Y, QIU W G, WANG H Y, et al. Research on image quality assessment method of tunnel face based on convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 563-572. (in Chinese)
    [21] CHEN J Y, ZHANG D M, HUANG H W, et al. Image-based segmentation and quantification of weak interlayers in rock tunnel face via deep learning[J]. Automation in Construction, 2020, 120: 103371. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103371
    [22] ZHANG W J, ZHANG W Q, ZHANG G L, et al. Hard-rock tunnel lithology identification using multi-scale dilated convolutional attention network based on tunnel face images[J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(12): 1796-1812. doi: 10.1007/s11709-023-0002-1
    [23] 彭 磊, 周 春, 胡 锋, 等. 基于深度学习的隧道掌子面节理智能检测与分割[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(10): 243-250. (PENG L, ZHOU C, HU F, et al. Intelligent detection and segmentation of tunnel face joints based on deep learning[J]. Yangtze River, 2023, 54(10): 243-250. (in Chinese)

    PENG L, ZHOU C, HU F, et al. Intelligent detection and segmentation of tunnel face joints based on deep learning[J]. Yangtze River, 2023, 54(10): 243-250. (in Chinese)
    [24] 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路隧道设计规范 第一册 土建工程: JTG 3370.1—2018[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2019. (Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Specifications for design of highway tunnels section 1 civil engineering: JTG 3370.1—2018[S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2019. (in Chinese)

    Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Specifications for design of highway tunnels section 1 civil engineering: JTG 3370.1—2018[S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [25] 王资健. 基于深度学习的隧道内人员防护装备视觉检测技术研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2022. (WANG Z J. Research on personal protective equipment detection in tunnel construction sites using computer vision and deep learning approaches[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2022. (in Chinese)

    WANG Z J. Research on personal protective equipment detection in tunnel construction sites using computer vision and deep learning approaches[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2022. (in Chinese)
    [26] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 回弹法检测混凝土抗压强度技术规程: JGJ/T 23—2011[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011. (Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Technical specification for inspecting of concrete compressive strength by rebound method: JGJ/T 23—2011[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2011. (in Chinese)

    Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Technical specification for inspecting of concrete compressive strength by rebound method: JGJ/T 23—2011[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
    [27] 谢飞鸿, 董建辉, 蔡建华, 等. 隧道围岩快速分级及超欠挖爆破智能控制研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022. (XIE F H, DONG J H, CAI J H, et al. Research on rapid classification of tunnel surrounding rock and intelligent control of over excavation and under excavation blasting[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2022. (in Chinese)

    XIE F H, DONG J H, CAI J H, et al. Research on rapid classification of tunnel surrounding rock and intelligent control of over excavation and under excavation blasting[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2022. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(9)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  9
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-02-10
  • 修回日期:  2025-04-18
  • 录用日期:  2025-06-26
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-04-09
  • 刊出日期:  2026-04-09

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回