Volume 36 Issue 3
Jun.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Wang Wei, Mao Huiyong, Fan Jianpeng, Zhang Jiqiang. Restoration Process and Measures of a Slope Damaged by Severe Disaster[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2022, 36(3): 224-229. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.03.010
Citation: Wang Wei, Mao Huiyong, Fan Jianpeng, Zhang Jiqiang. Restoration Process and Measures of a Slope Damaged by Severe Disaster[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2022, 36(3): 224-229. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.03.010

Restoration Process and Measures of a Slope Damaged by Severe Disaster

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.03.010
  • Received Date: 2021-03-02
    Available Online: 2022-06-02
  • Publish Date: 2022-06-08
  • Disaster assessment and supplementary geological survey were carried out, and monitoring data was analyzed in a damaged slope of a power plant in Nepal. Internationally stability analysis software was used for stability calculations. The deformation characteristics and causes were studied comprehensively, and the treatment schemes of integral restoration and local restoration were put forward. The slope restoration has been completed, and the slope is in good condition after the monsoon flood. It provides experience and reference for the treatment of artificial slopes after flood and earthquake disasters.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    程 强. 深切峡谷区公路桥梁段斜坡崩滑灾害风险评估[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(5):42-47.
    [2]
    徐 为,胡瑞林,吴 菲,等. 浅谈我国的地质灾害风险评估[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2010,21(4):126-129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2010.04.024
    [3]
    石菊松,石 玲,吴树仁,等. 滑坡风险评估实践中的难点与对策[J]. 地质通报,2009,28(8):1020-1030. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2009.08.003
    [4]
    朱兆华,赖 涛,陈晓蓉,等. 受损边坡生态修复工艺选择、目标群落设计与效果评价[J]. 西北林学院学报,2017,32(3):78-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.03.15
    [5]
    曹华英,朱兆华,徐国钢,等. 城市高陡岩石边坡V型槽生态修复的施工技术探索[J]. 江西农业学报,2013,25(6):129-131,139. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2013.06.036
    [6]
    朱兆华,陈晓蓉,徐国钢,等. 受损边坡生态修复与景观重建技术探索与实践[J]. 江西农业学报,2016,28(10):75-81.
    [7]
    梁永哲,夏振尧,牛鹏辉,等. 生态修复边坡水土保持效果评价方法研究−以向家坝水电站工程为例[J]. 湖北农业科学,2016,55(16):4335-4339.
    [8]
    CRUDEN D, VANDINE D F. Classification, description, causes and indirect effects–Canadian technical guidelines and best practices related to landslides: a national initiative for loss reduction[J]. Geological Survey of Canada, 2013.
    [9]
    周志军,赵 涛,钟世福,等. 基于地震力作用下的黄土边坡稳定性分析[J]. 公路交通科技,2013,30(9):38-42,60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2013.09.007
    [10]
    U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Stability of Earth and Rock-Fill dams[S]. EM 1110-2-1902. 1970.
    [11]
    郑荣跃,梧 松. 基于Spencer法的边坡稳定性可靠度指标分析[J]. 岩土力学,2006,(1):147-150,154. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2006.01.029
    [12]
    杨学堂,王 飞. 边坡稳定性评价方法及发展趋势[J]. 岩土工程技术,2004,18(2):103-106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2004.02.014
    [13]
    宫长亮,刘志超,刘述栋,等. Slide和Midas软件在排土场边坡稳定性分析及治理中的应用[J]. 勘察科学技术,2018,(5):35-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3946.2018.05.008
    [14]
    王江荣,梁永平,欧国海. 地震和暴雨工况下石头坪景区高边坡稳定性的数值模拟分析[J]. 安全与环境工程,2018,25(5):29-35.
    [15]
    雷谦荣. 边坡中地下水压力问题的探讨[J]. 工程勘察,1997,(1):29-32.
    [16]
    范庆来,刘远财. 库水位涨落与降雨联合作用下绿草码头滑坡渗流场分布规律及稳定性分析[J]. 水电能源科学,2015,33(1):102,115-118.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (122) PDF downloads(34) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return