Volume 36 Issue 2
Apr.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Wang Zhe, Zhang Lei, Wang Wei, Sun Zhaoyun, Xiang Guowei, Hu Guiling. Comparative Test Research on Temperature Shrinkage Performance of Modified Soil in Yellow River Flood Field[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2022, 36(2): 169-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.02.016
Citation: Wang Zhe, Zhang Lei, Wang Wei, Sun Zhaoyun, Xiang Guowei, Hu Guiling. Comparative Test Research on Temperature Shrinkage Performance of Modified Soil in Yellow River Flood Field[J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUE, 2022, 36(2): 169-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.02.016

Comparative Test Research on Temperature Shrinkage Performance of Modified Soil in Yellow River Flood Field

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.02.016
  • Received Date: 2021-01-21
  • Publish Date: 2022-04-02
  • Yellow River flood field of Shandong Province is a seasonally frozen soil area, and it is easy to crack when the temperature difference between day and night is large, which affects the integrity and continuity of the road surface. The soil in the yellow river flood field has poor particle gradation and low strength, which needs to be modified. In this study, the temperature shrinkage properties of three types of soil were compared, and results showed that cement and asphalt powder had an inhibitory effect on the temperature shrinkage and cracking of soil. Moreover, the temperature shrinkage coefficients were arranged in the following order: asphalt powder modified soil <cement modified soil < plain soil.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    屠晨阳. 水泥固化砂质粉土的强度试验及其机理研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江理工大学, 2018.
    [2]
    申爱琴,郑南翔,苏 毅,等. 含砂低液限粉土填筑路基压实机理及施工技术研究[J]. 中国公路学报,2000,(4):12-15. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7372.2000.04.003
    [3]
    高秋生,袁忠文,郭启臣. 含砂低液限粉性土在路基工程中的应用[J]. 科学技术创新,2015,(32):256. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1328.2015.32.237
    [4]
    姚占勇. 黄河冲淤积平原土的工程特性研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2006.
    [5]
    赵文斌. 浅谈含砂低液限粉土路基的改良技术[J]. 北方交通,2016,(9):31-34.
    [6]
    申爱琴,马 骉,苏 毅,等. 加固的含砂低液限粉土收缩性能研究[J]. 建筑材料学报,2000,(4):47-51.
    [7]
    刘雨彤. 纤维增强型TG复合固化土强度及稳定性试验研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2018.
    [8]
    朱志铎,郝建新,赵黎明. 高性能固化剂稳定粉质土路基的效果分析[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2009,(10):1599-1601.
    [9]
    栾茂田,汪东林,杨 庆,等. 非饱和重塑土的干燥收缩试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2008,30(1):118-122. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2008.01.018
    [10]
    周永祥,阎培渝. 不同类型盐渍土固化体的干缩与湿胀特性[J]. 岩土工程学报,2007,29(11):1653-1658. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2007.11.010
    [11]
    毛玮芸. 浅析道路工程建设中软弱土壤固化技术的研究进展[J]. 科技创新导报,2017,14(1):52-53,56.
    [12]
    王加龙,何兆益,黄维蓉. 无机结合料和固化剂稳定粉土收缩性能研究[J]. 重庆交通学院学报,2005,(2):83-89.
    [13]
    屠晨阳. 不同外掺剂时砂质粉土的固化试验研究[J]. 低温建筑技术,2018,40(5):98-102.
    [14]
    李迎春,钱春香,刘松玉,等. 粉土固化稳定机理研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2004,(2):268-271. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2004.02.023
    [15]
    洪雁平,陈 春. 多种粉土稳定材料的对比试验探讨[J]. 公路交通技术,2010,(4):12-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6477.2010.04.004
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (101) PDF downloads(26) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return